10.06.2013 Views

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

Electrophysiological Evidence for Sentence Comprehension - Wings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

there<strong>for</strong>e be promising in the studies employing the method of event-related potentials<br />

(ERP’s), especially when ERP is used <strong>for</strong> studies that aim processes beyond the sentence<br />

level as in St. George et al. (1994) Van Berkum, et al. (1999), van Berkum (2004).<br />

One of the general problems with studying sentence comprehension is the involvement of<br />

various factors of linguistic as well as non-linguistic in nature, so that it is not fully clear<br />

how these processes contribute to the changes detected. Linguistically, comprehension<br />

consists of a mapping from syntax to semantics. But how exactly is the meaning of the<br />

sentence built? On the level of individual words it can be said that words map into<br />

concepts. In the same way sentences map into sentence meanings. Words are combined<br />

into sentences via syntactic rules, but – to finish the drawing of this imagined rectangle –<br />

what is the nature of the process which combines concepts into sentence meanings? The<br />

idea that the sentence meaning is built up from concepts via specific recursive<br />

computations was proposed in the sixties (Katz & Fodor, 1963). It relies upon the fact<br />

that words and sentences, as well as their ‘semantic’ counterparts, concepts and sentence<br />

meanings are two different classes of objects with very different features. In a similar<br />

vein in a book that has been very influential in that time Fodor (1983) suggests that<br />

sentence comprehension is a ‘bottom-up’ process in which the computation is carried out<br />

in a encapsulated ‘language module’ which is not influenced by other cognitive abilities.<br />

The book triggered a controversy that is not resolved today: a big fault divides the<br />

tectonic plates of ‘bottom-up’ or ‘modular’ and ‘top-down’ models with interactive<br />

models of language comprehension in between. Fodor’s philosophical analysis neglects<br />

the real-world situation: sentence comprehension is a process that unwinds in time and in<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!