Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
10.06.2013 Views

2. Literature review; MDO 19 cooling, reaching its peak at the apex of the nose. Below this temperature, crystallisation is suppressed due to the rising viscosity of the supercooled liquid [2]. The critical cooling rate, [dT/dt]c to avoid 0.0001 % volume crystallisation can be approximately obtained from the TTT diagram, at any temperature on the nose, Tn, and corresponding time, tn. ⎡d T ⎤ Tl − T ⎢ ≈ ⎣ dt ⎥ ⎦ t c where Tl is the liquidus temperature [2]. n n (2.3) Heterogeneous nucleation has a strong influence on this critical cooling rate, compared to homogeneous nucleation, resulting in a [dT/dt]c value 5 to 10 times slower for homogeneous nucleation. As the contact angle of the heterogeneous nuclei decreases, so does [dT/dt]c. Complex compositions, and those close to eutectics can hinder nucleation processes (see below). Ideally a glass melt should have a high viscosity at Tl, or rapidly increasing below Tl on cooling [2], as seen with ‘typical’ glass formers in section 2.1.1. However, many low viscosity melts, such fluorozirconates (ZBLAN – ZrF4-BaF2- LaF3-AlF3-NaF), can be quenched to form a glass relatively easily. These ‘novel’ glass systems have viscosities of the order of water (10 -2 Pa.s) around their melting temperatures. Seddon et al. [8] showed that the most stable ZBLAN compositions occurred at the interface between two crystalline phases on the phase diagram (LaF3- 2ZrF4 and NaF-BaF2-2ZrF2). Therefore, it is believed that in the undercooled melt,

2. Literature review; MDO 20 crystallisation was suppressed due to the competition between these two phases. This idea might be extended to other novel glasses which have a low viscosity at the liquidus. 2.3. Tellurite glasses 2.3.1. Early studies The trioxide of tellurium (TeO3) decomposes when heated to dull redness with the formation of the dioxide (TeO2). Tellurium dioxide, is a white crystalline solid which can be melted at 733°C, without the gain or loss of oxygen [9]. Melts of pure TeO2 do not solidify to form a glass [2], but glass formation has been shown with systems of more than 90 mol. % TeO2 (eutectic region of TeO2-rich area of the phase diagram) and no other glass former present [2]. Since the early work of Berzelius in 1834 [10], very little was contributed to work on tellurite compounds, until Lenher et al. in 1913 [11] studied the chemistry of the so-named metallic tellurites, and observed that sodium di- and tetra- tellurite fuse below red heat to form a clear glass. In this work sodium tellurite was also found to be readily soluble in water (important when considering glass durability). In 1952, Stanworth [12, 13] performed the first major systematic studies on tellurite glasses on the basis Te 4+ has an electronegativity in the range of other good glass forming oxides (1.7 to 2.1) as shown in table (2.1) with some network formers for comparison. This is known as Stanworth’s electronegativity criterion [1].

2. Literature review; MDO 19<br />

cooling, reaching its peak at the apex of the nose. Below this temperature, crystallisation<br />

is suppressed due to the rising viscosity of the supercooled liquid [2].<br />

The critical cooling rate, [dT/dt]c to avoid 0.0001 % volume crystallisation can be<br />

approximately obtained from the TTT diagram, at any temperature on the nose, Tn, and<br />

corresponding time, tn.<br />

⎡d<br />

T ⎤ Tl<br />

− T<br />

⎢ ≈<br />

⎣ dt<br />

⎥<br />

⎦ t<br />

c<br />

where Tl is the liquidus temperature [2].<br />

n<br />

n<br />

(2.3)<br />

Heterogeneous nucleation has a strong influence on this critical cooling rate,<br />

compared to homogeneous nucleation, resulting in a [dT/dt]c value 5 to 10 times slower<br />

for homogeneous nucleation. As the contact angle of the heterogeneous nuclei decreases,<br />

so does [dT/dt]c. Complex compositions, and those close to eutectics can hinder<br />

nucleation processes (see below). Ideally a glass melt should have a high viscosity at Tl,<br />

or rapidly increasing below Tl on cooling [2], as seen with ‘typical’ glass formers in<br />

section 2.1.1.<br />

However, many low viscosity melts, such fluorozirconates (ZBLAN – ZrF4-BaF2-<br />

LaF3-AlF3-NaF), can be quenched to form a glass relatively easily. These ‘novel’ glass<br />

systems have viscosities of the order of water (10 -2 Pa.s) around their melting<br />

temperatures. Seddon et al. [8] showed that the most stable ZBLAN compositions<br />

occurred at the interface between two crystalline phases on the phase diagram (LaF3-<br />

2ZrF4 and NaF-BaF2-2ZrF2). Therefore, it is believed that in the undercooled melt,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!