Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive
Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive
2. Literature review; MDO 19 cooling, reaching its peak at the apex of the nose. Below this temperature, crystallisation is suppressed due to the rising viscosity of the supercooled liquid [2]. The critical cooling rate, [dT/dt]c to avoid 0.0001 % volume crystallisation can be approximately obtained from the TTT diagram, at any temperature on the nose, Tn, and corresponding time, tn. ⎡d T ⎤ Tl − T ⎢ ≈ ⎣ dt ⎥ ⎦ t c where Tl is the liquidus temperature [2]. n n (2.3) Heterogeneous nucleation has a strong influence on this critical cooling rate, compared to homogeneous nucleation, resulting in a [dT/dt]c value 5 to 10 times slower for homogeneous nucleation. As the contact angle of the heterogeneous nuclei decreases, so does [dT/dt]c. Complex compositions, and those close to eutectics can hinder nucleation processes (see below). Ideally a glass melt should have a high viscosity at Tl, or rapidly increasing below Tl on cooling [2], as seen with ‘typical’ glass formers in section 2.1.1. However, many low viscosity melts, such fluorozirconates (ZBLAN – ZrF4-BaF2- LaF3-AlF3-NaF), can be quenched to form a glass relatively easily. These ‘novel’ glass systems have viscosities of the order of water (10 -2 Pa.s) around their melting temperatures. Seddon et al. [8] showed that the most stable ZBLAN compositions occurred at the interface between two crystalline phases on the phase diagram (LaF3- 2ZrF4 and NaF-BaF2-2ZrF2). Therefore, it is believed that in the undercooled melt,
2. Literature review; MDO 20 crystallisation was suppressed due to the competition between these two phases. This idea might be extended to other novel glasses which have a low viscosity at the liquidus. 2.3. Tellurite glasses 2.3.1. Early studies The trioxide of tellurium (TeO3) decomposes when heated to dull redness with the formation of the dioxide (TeO2). Tellurium dioxide, is a white crystalline solid which can be melted at 733°C, without the gain or loss of oxygen [9]. Melts of pure TeO2 do not solidify to form a glass [2], but glass formation has been shown with systems of more than 90 mol. % TeO2 (eutectic region of TeO2-rich area of the phase diagram) and no other glass former present [2]. Since the early work of Berzelius in 1834 [10], very little was contributed to work on tellurite compounds, until Lenher et al. in 1913 [11] studied the chemistry of the so-named metallic tellurites, and observed that sodium di- and tetra- tellurite fuse below red heat to form a clear glass. In this work sodium tellurite was also found to be readily soluble in water (important when considering glass durability). In 1952, Stanworth [12, 13] performed the first major systematic studies on tellurite glasses on the basis Te 4+ has an electronegativity in the range of other good glass forming oxides (1.7 to 2.1) as shown in table (2.1) with some network formers for comparison. This is known as Stanworth’s electronegativity criterion [1].
- Page 1 and 2: TELLURITE AND FLUOROTELLURITE GLASS
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract Glasses systems based on T
- Page 5 and 6: Contents; MDO i Contents Contents i
- Page 7 and 8: Contents; MDO iii 6.1.2.1. Method a
- Page 9 and 10: Glossary; MDO Glossary aM = partial
- Page 11 and 12: Glossary; MDO λ = wavelength λn =
- Page 13 and 14: Glossary; MDO Ψ = complex dielectr
- Page 15 and 16: 1. Introduction; MDO 2 communicatio
- Page 17 and 18: 1. Introduction; MDO 4 Infrared tra
- Page 19 and 20: 1. Introduction; MDO 6 1.4. Thesis
- Page 21 and 22: 1. Introduction; MDO 8 [14] J. E. S
- Page 23 and 24: 2. Literature review; MDO 10 one of
- Page 25 and 26: 2. Literature review; MDO 12 superc
- Page 27 and 28: 2. Literature review; MDO 14 2.2.2.
- Page 29 and 30: 2. Literature review; MDO 16 phenom
- Page 31: 2. Literature review; MDO 18 tenden
- Page 35 and 36: 2. Literature review; MDO 22 the Za
- Page 37 and 38: 2. Literature review; MDO 24 2.3.2.
- Page 39 and 40: 2. Literature review; MDO 26 Champa
- Page 41 and 42: 2. Literature review; MDO 28 the ad
- Page 43 and 44: 2. Literature review; MDO 30 (a) (b
- Page 45 and 46: 2. Literature review; MDO 32 showed
- Page 47 and 48: 2. Literature review; MDO 34 absorp
- Page 49 and 50: 2. Literature review; MDO 36 sharp
- Page 51 and 52: 2. Literature review; MDO 38 near f
- Page 53 and 54: 2. Literature review; MDO 40 where
- Page 55 and 56: 2. Literature review; MDO 42 Transm
- Page 57 and 58: 2. Literature review; MDO 44 origin
- Page 59 and 60: 2. Literature review; MDO 46 4 α =
- Page 61 and 62: 2. Literature review; MDO 48 Bragli
- Page 63 and 64: 2. Literature review; MDO 50 It can
- Page 65 and 66: 2. Literature review; MDO 52 and su
- Page 67 and 68: 2. Literature review; MDO 54 be bro
- Page 69 and 70: 2. Literature review; MDO 56 2.5.2.
- Page 71 and 72: 2. Literature review; MDO 58 Table
- Page 73 and 74: 2. Literature review; MDO 60 2.5.2.
- Page 75 and 76: 2. Literature review; MDO 62 [20] J
- Page 77 and 78: 2. Literature review; MDO 64 [47] S
- Page 79 and 80: 3. Glass batching and melting; MDO
- Page 81 and 82: 3. Glass batching and melting; MDO
2. Literature review; MDO 19<br />
cooling, reaching its peak at the apex of the nose. Below this temperature, crystallisation<br />
is suppressed due to the rising viscosity of the supercooled liquid [2].<br />
The critical cooling rate, [dT/dt]c to avoid 0.0001 % volume crystallisation can be<br />
approximately obtained from the TTT diagram, at any temperature on the nose, Tn, and<br />
corresponding time, tn.<br />
⎡d<br />
T ⎤ Tl<br />
− T<br />
⎢ ≈<br />
⎣ dt<br />
⎥<br />
⎦ t<br />
c<br />
where Tl is the liquidus temperature [2].<br />
n<br />
n<br />
(2.3)<br />
Heterogeneous nucleation has a strong influence on this critical cooling rate,<br />
compared to homogeneous nucleation, resulting in a [dT/dt]c value 5 to 10 times slower<br />
for homogeneous nucleation. As the contact angle of the heterogeneous nuclei decreases,<br />
so does [dT/dt]c. Complex compositions, and those close to eutectics can hinder<br />
nucleation processes (see below). Ideally a glass melt should have a high viscosity at Tl,<br />
or rapidly increasing below Tl on cooling [2], as seen with ‘typical’ glass formers in<br />
section 2.1.1.<br />
However, many low viscosity melts, such fluorozirconates (ZBLAN – ZrF4-BaF2-<br />
LaF3-AlF3-NaF), can be quenched to form a glass relatively easily. These ‘novel’ glass<br />
systems have viscosities of the order of water (10 -2 Pa.s) around their melting<br />
temperatures. Seddon et al. [8] showed that the most stable ZBLAN compositions<br />
occurred at the interface between two crystalline phases on the phase diagram (LaF3-<br />
2ZrF4 and NaF-BaF2-2ZrF2). Therefore, it is believed that in the undercooled melt,