10.06.2013 Views

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Surface properties; MDO 306<br />

The first point was left out of the exponential decay fit, as this lower at. % silver value at<br />

0 µm was most likely due to the presence of the surface attack from the molten salt,<br />

resulting in many voids, and heavy pitting (ridges spaced around 0.5 mm) at the glass<br />

surface, producing a spurious value.<br />

7.3. Discussion<br />

7.3.1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)<br />

7.3.1.1. XPS of ZnF2 powder<br />

Fig. (7.5) and (7.6) show the low resolution XPS spectra of ZnF2 powder used in this<br />

study before and after fluorination. As expected, the oxygen levels were significantly<br />

reduced by this treatment [7]. This can be seen from table (7.3), which summarises the<br />

quantitative analysis from the high resolution scans. If it is assumed that all of the oxygen<br />

in the powders was within the Zn(OH)F phase identified by XRD in chapter 5, it is<br />

possible to calculate the proportion of Zn(OH)F and ZnF2 in the powders before and after<br />

fluorination. Zn(OH)F is composed of 33.33 at. % zinc, 33.33 at. % OH (i.e. oxygen),<br />

and 33.33 at. % fluorine. ZnF2 is composed of 33.33 at. % zinc, and 66.67 at. % fluorine.<br />

Therefore, 13.22 at % O1s XPS peak from table (7.3), results from 39.67 mol. %<br />

Zn(OH)F and 60.33 mol. % ZnF2. <strong>For</strong> the fluorinated sample, the 3.12 at. % O1s XPS<br />

peak from table (7.3), results from 9.35 mol. % Zn(OH)F and 90.65 mol. % ZnF2. This is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!