Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

etheses.nottingham.ac.uk
from etheses.nottingham.ac.uk More from this publisher
10.06.2013 Views

6. Optical properties; MDO 235 Comparison of infrared spectra of oxide tellurite glasses with a view to the manufacture of low optical loss mid-infrared fibre Glasses in the ternary system TeO2-ZnO-Na2O exhibited transmission to around 1667 cm -1 (6 µm) with OH absorption bands of around 0.6 cm -1 (600 dB.m -1 ) in intensity. The addition of a few mol. % GeO2, PbO, or varying the ZnO content of these glasses did not dramatically alter the multiphonon edge, or intensity of the OH bands. The OH bands in the tungsten-tellurite glasses were less intense than the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O glasses, at around 0.2 cm -1 (200 dB.m -1 ). However, these glasses did not transmit as far into the infrared, and addition of tungsten significantly shifted the multiphonon edge to higher wavenumbers: 5 mol. % WO3 1862 cm -1 (5.37 µm), 7.5 mol. % WO3 1905 cm -1 (5.25 µm), and 25 mol. % WO3 1946 cm -1 (5.14 µm). For low loss fibre in the 2 to 5 µm region, the tungsten-tellurite glasses would be more suitable than the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O glasses, due to the lower intensity OH bands seen, although reflection losses would be higher due to higher refractive indices. Because of the refractory nature of the compounds in the tungsten-tellurite glasses (WO3 and Nb2O5), fibre pulled from these materials would have better environmental durability than the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O based glasses. However, processing such as fibre drawing would have to be carried out at higher temperatures as the fibre drawing viscosity (≈ 10 4.5 Pa.s) would occur at higher temperatures for the tungsten-tellurite glasses compared to the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O glass. If transmission is required to 6 µm, the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O based glasses would be more suitable, and have the advantage of altering the refractive index for a core / clad pair with

6. Optical properties; MDO 236 addition of PbO or GeO2, without significantly affecting the multiphonon edge, although OH bands were more intense. 6.3.1.2. Infrared spectroscopy of fluorotellurite glasses Infrared spectroscopy of series (90-x)TeO2-10Na2O-xZnF2 mol. %, for 5 ≤ x ≤ 30 mol. % Fig. (6.26) shows the infrared spectra of glasses of the series (90-x)TeO2-10Na2O-xZnF2, mol. %, for 5 ≤ x ≤ 30 mol. % (glasses MOF001, 004 to 008). Glass MOD013 (80TeO2- 10Na2O-10ZnO mol. %) was also plotted for comparison. As expected the intensity of the OH spectral absorptions decrease with increasing ZnF2 content and melting time as the glass is dried in situ (see section 3). Fig. (6.27) illustrates this, by plotting the loss in dB.m -1 attributed to the free-OH at 2900 cm -1 with increasing ZnF2 content, which plateaux to a minimum loss of around 20 dB.m -1 at compositions containing more than 15 mol. % ZnF2. The drying effect was significant, as the 5 mol. % ZnF2 glass showed an optical loss of around 120 dB.m -1 at 2900 cm -1 [5]. Fig. (6.28) shows the effect of melting time of glass MOF001 (65TeO2.25ZnF2.10Na2O mol. %), on the loss caused by spectral absorption of the OH band around 2900 cm -1 . After 1 hour of melting the optical loss of the finished glass MOF001 (65TeO2-10Na2O-25ZnF2 mol. %) was relatively high (comparable to the pure oxide glass MOD013 - 80TeO2-10Na2O-10ZnO mol. %), however after 2 hours of melting the loss had decreased by almost two orders of magnitude (from 705 to 10 dB.m -1 ) showing the importance of melting time for the drying process [5].

6. Optical properties; MDO 235<br />

Comparison of infrared spectra of oxide tellurite glasses with a view to the manufacture<br />

of low optical loss mid-infrared fibre<br />

<strong>Glasses</strong> in the ternary system TeO2-ZnO-Na2O exhibited transmission to around 1667<br />

cm -1 (6 µm) with OH absorption bands of around 0.6 cm -1 (600 dB.m -1 ) in intensity. The<br />

addition of a few mol. % GeO2, PbO, or varying the ZnO content of these glasses did not<br />

dramatically alter the multiphonon edge, or intensity of the OH bands. The OH bands in<br />

the tungsten-tellurite glasses were less intense than the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O glasses, at<br />

around 0.2 cm -1 (200 dB.m -1 ). However, these glasses did not transmit as far into the<br />

infrared, and addition of tungsten significantly shifted the multiphonon edge to higher<br />

wavenumbers: 5 mol. % WO3 1862 cm -1 (5.37 µm), 7.5 mol. % WO3 1905 cm -1 (5.25<br />

µm), and 25 mol. % WO3 1946 cm -1 (5.14 µm). <strong>For</strong> low loss fibre in the 2 to 5 µm<br />

region, the tungsten-tellurite glasses would be more suitable than the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O<br />

glasses, due to the lower intensity OH bands seen, although reflection losses would be<br />

higher due to higher refractive indices. Because of the refractory nature of the compounds<br />

in the tungsten-tellurite glasses (WO3 and Nb2O5), fibre pulled from these materials<br />

would have better environmental durability than the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O based glasses.<br />

However, processing such as fibre drawing would have to be carried out at higher<br />

temperatures as the fibre drawing viscosity (≈ 10 4.5 Pa.s) would occur at higher<br />

temperatures for the tungsten-tellurite glasses compared to the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O glass. If<br />

transmission is required to 6 µm, the TeO2-ZnO-Na2O based glasses would be more<br />

suitable, and have the advantage of altering the refractive index for a core / clad pair with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!