10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF BOLTED END PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN STEEL JOINTS<br />

The end plate represents an important component for <strong>the</strong> joints considered. The<br />

end plate responses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> isolated Tee stub TC-2 <strong>and</strong> Complete Joint JA1-2A are<br />

plotted in Figure 3.23. As mentioned above, <strong>the</strong> testing procedure imposes<br />

different cycle amplitudes <strong>and</strong> affects <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cycles at failure. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse mode is <strong>the</strong> same, i.e., by plate fracturing, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

hysteretic <strong>behaviour</strong> has similar features. A comparison between <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

force <strong>and</strong> displacement shows an overestimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first parameter <strong>of</strong> 7% <strong>and</strong> an<br />

underestimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second <strong>of</strong> 13% with reference to <strong>the</strong> Tee stub response. The<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interaction between <strong>the</strong> different components in <strong>the</strong> joint appears<br />

to be limited. The same comparison between <strong>the</strong> joint JB1-3 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

Tee stubs TC-3 shows similar results, as evidenced in Figure 3.24.<br />

70<br />

REACTION FORCE (kN)<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

-100<br />

-200<br />

-300<br />

-400<br />

TC-2<br />

JA1-2A (ENDPLATE)<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

DISPLACEMENT (mm)<br />

Figure 3.23. Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental<br />

response <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tee stub TC-2 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> End plate <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Complete Joint JA1-2A<br />

A more accurate appraisal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> responses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elemental components can be<br />

obtained if reference is made to key parameters, such as <strong>the</strong> initial elastic stiffness<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> plastic failure strength, which characterize <strong>the</strong> envelope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclic<br />

response. A conventional elastic stiffness Ke, a plastic failure strength Fp <strong>and</strong> an<br />

ultimate displacement ductility factor eu/ey were determined by <strong>the</strong> bi- <strong>and</strong> tri-linear<br />

approximations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> envelope curve, traced on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> best-fitting <strong>and</strong><br />

dissipated energy-equivalence criteria. Values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elastic stiffness Ke relevant to<br />

<strong>the</strong> components <strong>of</strong> joints JA1-2 <strong>and</strong> JB1-3 <strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> corresponding isolated <strong>and</strong><br />

coupled Tee stubs are presented in Table 3.6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!