10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF BOLTED END PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN STEEL JOINTS<br />

is associated with <strong>the</strong> coupling <strong>of</strong> two ‘thin’ elements with relatively heavy bolts,<br />

showed <strong>the</strong> best performance in terms <strong>of</strong> mean energy ratio. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

<strong>the</strong> coupling <strong>of</strong> a thick Tee stub with a column flange <strong>of</strong> similar thickness like <strong>the</strong><br />

C1B2-3 specimen ensues <strong>the</strong> lowest energy ratio.<br />

3.5.3 Complete Joints<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coupled Tee stub tests, attention is focused on<br />

joints JA1-2 <strong>and</strong> JB1-3, which appear to be more adequate in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>seismic</strong><br />

design requirements. In this subsection <strong>the</strong> monotonic tests will be discussed as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> cyclic tests adopting <strong>the</strong> ECCS displacement procedure (1986). The<br />

subsequent set <strong>of</strong> tests adopting <strong>the</strong> different procedures shown in Figure 3.4<br />

aimed at providing data for <strong>the</strong> calibration <strong>of</strong> damage models considered but will<br />

not be discussed in this study. Both <strong>the</strong> monotonic <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclic moment rotation<br />

response relative to <strong>the</strong> Complete Joint endowed with a 12 mm end plate thickness<br />

coupled with <strong>the</strong> column <strong>of</strong> HEA180 pr<strong>of</strong>ile, i.e. JB1-2M <strong>and</strong> JB1-2A specimen,<br />

respectively are illustrated in Figure 3.15.<br />

REACTION MOMENT (kNm)<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

0<br />

-30<br />

-60<br />

-90<br />

JA1-2A<br />

JA1-2M<br />

-120<br />

-75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125<br />

ROTATION (mrad)<br />

Figure 3.15. Experimental response <strong>of</strong> JA1-2M <strong>and</strong><br />

JA1-2A Complete Joints<br />

Similar <strong>behaviour</strong>al features were observed for <strong>the</strong> joint JB1-3A, <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> twin<br />

specimens JA1-2B <strong>and</strong> JB1-3B (see Figure 3.16). These joints exhibited failure at<br />

weld toes in <strong>the</strong> end plate part outside <strong>the</strong> beam section owing to fragile crack<br />

propagation, as illustrated in Figure 3.17. This indicates a satisfactory <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fillet welds. The monotonic response is characterized by inelastic phenomena<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!