Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF BOLTED END PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN STEEL JOINTS<br />
is associated with <strong>the</strong> coupling <strong>of</strong> two ‘thin’ elements with relatively heavy bolts,<br />
showed <strong>the</strong> best performance in terms <strong>of</strong> mean energy ratio. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
<strong>the</strong> coupling <strong>of</strong> a thick Tee stub with a column flange <strong>of</strong> similar thickness like <strong>the</strong><br />
C1B2-3 specimen ensues <strong>the</strong> lowest energy ratio.<br />
3.5.3 Complete Joints<br />
On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coupled Tee stub tests, attention is focused on<br />
joints JA1-2 <strong>and</strong> JB1-3, which appear to be more adequate in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>seismic</strong><br />
design requirements. In this subsection <strong>the</strong> monotonic tests will be discussed as<br />
well as <strong>the</strong> cyclic tests adopting <strong>the</strong> ECCS displacement procedure (1986). The<br />
subsequent set <strong>of</strong> tests adopting <strong>the</strong> different procedures shown in Figure 3.4<br />
aimed at providing data for <strong>the</strong> calibration <strong>of</strong> damage models considered but will<br />
not be discussed in this study. Both <strong>the</strong> monotonic <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclic moment rotation<br />
response relative to <strong>the</strong> Complete Joint endowed with a 12 mm end plate thickness<br />
coupled with <strong>the</strong> column <strong>of</strong> HEA180 pr<strong>of</strong>ile, i.e. JB1-2M <strong>and</strong> JB1-2A specimen,<br />
respectively are illustrated in Figure 3.15.<br />
REACTION MOMENT (kNm)<br />
120<br />
90<br />
60<br />
30<br />
0<br />
-30<br />
-60<br />
-90<br />
JA1-2A<br />
JA1-2M<br />
-120<br />
-75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125<br />
ROTATION (mrad)<br />
Figure 3.15. Experimental response <strong>of</strong> JA1-2M <strong>and</strong><br />
JA1-2A Complete Joints<br />
Similar <strong>behaviour</strong>al features were observed for <strong>the</strong> joint JB1-3A, <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> twin<br />
specimens JA1-2B <strong>and</strong> JB1-3B (see Figure 3.16). These joints exhibited failure at<br />
weld toes in <strong>the</strong> end plate part outside <strong>the</strong> beam section owing to fragile crack<br />
propagation, as illustrated in Figure 3.17. This indicates a satisfactory <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> fillet welds. The monotonic response is characterized by inelastic phenomena<br />
63