10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES<br />

2.6 References<br />

Akiyama H. (1985): Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings.<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Tokio Press.<br />

ATC – Applied Technology Council (1995): Guidelines <strong>and</strong> commentary for<br />

<strong>seismic</strong> rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> buildings. ATC Report 33.03, Redwood City,<br />

California.<br />

Bertero R.D. <strong>and</strong> Bertero V.V. (2002): Performance-based <strong>seismic</strong><br />

engineering: <strong>the</strong> need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach.<br />

Earthquake Engineering And Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, 627–652.<br />

Bertero V.V. (1992): Major issues <strong>and</strong> future directions in earthquake<br />

resistant design. In 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,<br />

Madrid, 19-24 July 1992, Balkema, Rotterdam, 6407-6444.<br />

Bertero V.V. (1997): Performance-based <strong>seismic</strong> engineering: a critical<br />

review <strong>of</strong> proposed guidelines. In Seismic Design Methodologies for <strong>the</strong> Next<br />

Generation <strong>of</strong> Codes, (Eds. P. Fajfar, H. Krawinkler), Bled, 24-27 June 1997,<br />

Balkema, Rotterdam, 1-31.<br />

Chopra A. K. (1995): Dynamics <strong>of</strong> structures: <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> applications to<br />

earthquake engineering. Chapters 3, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.<br />

Chopra A.K. <strong>and</strong> Goel R.K. (1999): Capacity-dem<strong>and</strong>-diagram methods for<br />

estimating <strong>seismic</strong> deformation <strong>of</strong> inelastic structures: SDoF systems. Report<br />

No. PEER-1999/02 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley.<br />

Fajfar P. (1995): Design spectra for new generation codes: Eurocode 8<br />

achieves <strong>the</strong> half-way mark. In 10th European Conference on Earthquake<br />

Engineering (Ed. G. Duma), Vienna, 28 August – 2 September 1994, Balkema,<br />

Rotterdam, Vol. 4, 2969-2974.<br />

Fajfar P. (1998): Trends in <strong>seismic</strong> design <strong>and</strong> performance evaluation<br />

approaches. In 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris,<br />

6 – 11 September 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam, Invited Lectures, 237-249.<br />

Fajfar P. <strong>and</strong> Fischinger M. (1988): N2- A method for non-linear <strong>seismic</strong><br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> regular structures. In 9th World Conference on Earthquake<br />

Engineering, Tokio-Kyoto, Japan, Vol. 5, 111-116.<br />

FEMA 273 (1997): HEHRP Guidelines for <strong>the</strong> <strong>seismic</strong> rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency.<br />

Freeman S. A., Nicoletti J. P., <strong>and</strong> Tyrell J. V. (1975): Evaluations <strong>of</strong><br />

existing buildings for <strong>seismic</strong> risk - A case study <strong>of</strong> Puget Sound Naval<br />

Shipyard. Bremerton, Washington. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 1st U.S. National<br />

Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Berkeley, 113-122.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!