Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES<br />
2.6 References<br />
Akiyama H. (1985): Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings.<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Tokio Press.<br />
ATC – Applied Technology Council (1995): Guidelines <strong>and</strong> commentary for<br />
<strong>seismic</strong> rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> buildings. ATC Report 33.03, Redwood City,<br />
California.<br />
Bertero R.D. <strong>and</strong> Bertero V.V. (2002): Performance-based <strong>seismic</strong><br />
engineering: <strong>the</strong> need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach.<br />
Earthquake Engineering And Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, 627–652.<br />
Bertero V.V. (1992): Major issues <strong>and</strong> future directions in earthquake<br />
resistant design. In 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,<br />
Madrid, 19-24 July 1992, Balkema, Rotterdam, 6407-6444.<br />
Bertero V.V. (1997): Performance-based <strong>seismic</strong> engineering: a critical<br />
review <strong>of</strong> proposed guidelines. In Seismic Design Methodologies for <strong>the</strong> Next<br />
Generation <strong>of</strong> Codes, (Eds. P. Fajfar, H. Krawinkler), Bled, 24-27 June 1997,<br />
Balkema, Rotterdam, 1-31.<br />
Chopra A. K. (1995): Dynamics <strong>of</strong> structures: <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> applications to<br />
earthquake engineering. Chapters 3, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.<br />
Chopra A.K. <strong>and</strong> Goel R.K. (1999): Capacity-dem<strong>and</strong>-diagram methods for<br />
estimating <strong>seismic</strong> deformation <strong>of</strong> inelastic structures: SDoF systems. Report<br />
No. PEER-1999/02 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College<br />
<strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley.<br />
Fajfar P. (1995): Design spectra for new generation codes: Eurocode 8<br />
achieves <strong>the</strong> half-way mark. In 10th European Conference on Earthquake<br />
Engineering (Ed. G. Duma), Vienna, 28 August – 2 September 1994, Balkema,<br />
Rotterdam, Vol. 4, 2969-2974.<br />
Fajfar P. (1998): Trends in <strong>seismic</strong> design <strong>and</strong> performance evaluation<br />
approaches. In 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris,<br />
6 – 11 September 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam, Invited Lectures, 237-249.<br />
Fajfar P. <strong>and</strong> Fischinger M. (1988): N2- A method for non-linear <strong>seismic</strong><br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> regular structures. In 9th World Conference on Earthquake<br />
Engineering, Tokio-Kyoto, Japan, Vol. 5, 111-116.<br />
FEMA 273 (1997): HEHRP Guidelines for <strong>the</strong> <strong>seismic</strong> rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />
buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency.<br />
Freeman S. A., Nicoletti J. P., <strong>and</strong> Tyrell J. V. (1975): Evaluations <strong>of</strong><br />
existing buildings for <strong>seismic</strong> risk - A case study <strong>of</strong> Puget Sound Naval<br />
Shipyard. Bremerton, Washington. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 1st U.S. National<br />
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Berkeley, 113-122.<br />
37