10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES<br />

against injury or death. Criteria for structure checking to minor or moderate<br />

earthquakes that may occur relatively frequently in <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> building are not<br />

specified explicitly. A review <strong>of</strong> 41 codes elaborated all over <strong>the</strong> world shows that<br />

38 are based on just one level, <strong>the</strong> principal design being concentrated on strength<br />

requirements (Bertero, 1997). So, <strong>the</strong> first step in <strong>the</strong> performance basic design<br />

philosophy is to define an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> damage due to an earthquake, <strong>and</strong><br />

this is <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> design code.<br />

Performance-based <strong>seismic</strong> engineering, elaborated by <strong>the</strong> Vision 2000 Committee<br />

<strong>of</strong> SEAOC (1995) <strong>and</strong> ATC (1995), consists <strong>of</strong> a selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate systems,<br />

layout <strong>and</strong> detailing <strong>of</strong> a structure, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> non-structural components <strong>and</strong> contents<br />

so that, at specified levels <strong>of</strong> ground motion <strong>and</strong> defined levels <strong>of</strong> reliability, <strong>the</strong><br />

structure will not be damaged, beyond certain limit states. The performance levels<br />

have been defined for four levels as a combination <strong>of</strong> damage to structure <strong>and</strong> to<br />

non-structural elements, building facilities <strong>and</strong> required repairs.<br />

1. Near collapse level: collapse prevention is directly related to <strong>the</strong> prevention<br />

<strong>of</strong> casualties <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> damage to <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> buildings. The structure can<br />

undergo serious damage during <strong>the</strong> major earthquakes, but it must be<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ing after <strong>the</strong> ground motion.<br />

2. Life safe level: <strong>the</strong> casualties in a building are usually caused by <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> building components during an earthquake. The evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> casualties as an economic damage in an optimisation<br />

process, as suggested in some studies, poses very difficult ethical<br />

problems.<br />

3. Operational level: a distinction is made between structural damage which<br />

cannot be repaired <strong>and</strong> damage which can be repaired. Irreparable<br />

damage is a specific subject for individual engineering judgement <strong>of</strong><br />

experts. The damage refers both to structure <strong>and</strong> to non-structural<br />

elements.<br />

4. Fully operational level: in some cases <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> business is more<br />

important than <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> buildings <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> interruption <strong>of</strong><br />

this activity is intolerable. If <strong>the</strong> owner <strong>of</strong> a building wishes to avoid <strong>the</strong> cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> interruptions, it is necessary to fulfil more than <strong>the</strong> minimum requirement<br />

<strong>of</strong> design codes. By using stronger <strong>and</strong> stiffer designs, it is possible to<br />

reduce or even eliminate, <strong>the</strong> interruption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> building function after a<br />

strong earthquake, but this results in a more expensive structure.<br />

These limit states are presented in Figure 2.4, as a function both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> non-structural elements. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>seismic</strong> load-top sway displacement curve,<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!