10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC COLUMNS EMBEDDING STEEL PROFILES<br />

• Strain gauges SG-23 to 26 on <strong>the</strong> reinforcing bars <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beam as shown at<br />

216<br />

Figure 5.26. All strain gauges are linear strain gauges. By means <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

measurements, coupled with those recorded by <strong>the</strong> Ω−transducer, it is possible<br />

to obtain information about <strong>the</strong> deformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beam section in <strong>the</strong><br />

closeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> joint during <strong>the</strong> test; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n, to reproduce <strong>the</strong> bending<br />

moment acting in <strong>the</strong> joint.<br />

SG-23-24<br />

SG-25-26<br />

Figure 5.26. Interior strain gauges<br />

located in <strong>the</strong> rebars <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concrete<br />

beam<br />

5.5.5 Test procedure <strong>and</strong> loading history<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> a testing program <strong>and</strong> associated loading history depends on <strong>the</strong><br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiment, type <strong>of</strong> test specimen, <strong>and</strong> type <strong>of</strong> expected failure<br />

mode. The following testing procedures are intended as a reference, to produce an<br />

adequate <strong>and</strong>, as much as possible, a unified way to carry out tests in order to<br />

characterize <strong>the</strong> structural <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> structural component substructures.<br />

The ECCS Procedure (1986) should help to verify <strong>the</strong> common design relationship<br />

between a pseudo-static horizontal force <strong>and</strong> a specified ductility or displacement<br />

given by Codes <strong>and</strong> Recommendations, such as, for instance <strong>the</strong> ECCS<br />

Recommendations for Steel Structures in Seismic Zones. This procedure has been<br />

chosen to set forward <strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> element in that peculiar context.<br />

The complete definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test also requires data on <strong>the</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>seismic</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> non-<strong>seismic</strong> loads. The testing procedure may include preliminary classical<br />

monotonic displacement increase tests or obviate <strong>the</strong>m. In <strong>the</strong> first case, it is called<br />

complete testing procedure; in <strong>the</strong> opposite case, it is called short testing<br />

procedure. From <strong>the</strong> F-e curve recorded during <strong>the</strong> monotonic test, <strong>the</strong><br />

+<br />

conventional limit <strong>of</strong> elastic range Fy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> corresponding displacement ey may<br />

be deduced. In <strong>the</strong> present study case, Fy <strong>and</strong> ey are not known at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!