Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS Pseudo-dynamic and cyclic test results confirmed that properly designed and constructed partial strength beam-to-column joints and partially encased columns without concrete in column web panels exhibit a favourable behaviour in terms of energy dissipation, limited strength degradation and ductility. 4.12 References AISC (1997), Seismic provision for structural steel buildings, Task Committee 113. Braconi A., Caramelli S., Cioni P., Salvatore W. (2003): Earthquake-resistant composite steel-concrete frames: some constructional considerations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Metal Structures, ICMS 2003.University of Miskolc, Hungary. Bursi O.S., Ferrario F., Fontanari V. (2992): Non-linear Analysis of the Low- cycle Fracture Behaviour of Isolated Tee Stub Connections. Computers and Structures, 80, 2333-2360. Bursi O.S., Lucchesi D, Salvatore W. (2003): Beam-to-column connections for steel-concrete composite moment resisting frame designed for ductility class H. To be presented in the Ninth International Conference on Civil and Structural Engineering Computing. Egmond aan Zee. Caramelli S., Salvatore W., Bursi O.S., Braconi A., Ferrario F. (2002): ECSC Project 7210-PR-250 Ecoleader Project, Steel-concrete composite 3D Frame - Design according to Eurocodes, University of Pisa and University of Trento. Chen, W. F. (1982): Plasticity in reinforced concrete. McGraw-Hill, New York, 270. Clogh R.W., Penzien J. (1993): Dynamics of Structures. Second Edition, McGraw-Hill ed. ECCS (1986): Recommended Testing Procedure for Assessing the Behaviour of Structural Steel Elements under Cyclic Loads. ECCS Publication n° 45. ECCS (1999): Design of composite joints for buildings. N° 109. FEMA 273 (1997): HEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 350 (2000): Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Gioncu, V. and Mazzolani, F.M. (2002): Ductility of seismic resistant steel Structures. Spon Press, London, 1-40. 171
4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS 172 Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorenson (2001): ABAQUS user’s manual – version 6.2.4. Pawtucket. R.I. Hilleborg A., Modéer M. and Peterson, P.E. (1976): Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research, 6, 773-782. International Conference of Building Officials (1997) Uniform building code, ICBO, Whittier, CA. Kim K., Engelhardt, M.D. (1995): Development of analytical models for earthquake analysis of steel moment frames. Report no. PMFSEL 95-2, Phil M. Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX; 1995. Kim K., Engelhardt, M.D. (2001): Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames. Journal of Constructional Steel research. Elsevier. Article in press. Krawinkler H. (1978): Shear in Beam-Column Joints in Seismic Design of Steel Frames. Engineering Journal AISC Vol. 3. Krawinkler H, Bertero V.V. and Popov E.P. (1971): Inelastic behavior of steel beam-to-column subassemblages. Report No. EERC 71/07, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998): Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Journal of Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, No. 4-6, 452-464. Lee S.J., Lu L.W. (1989): Cyclic Tests of Full-Scale Composite Joint Subassemblage. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 115, n° 8. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., Park, R. (1988): Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114, 8, 1804-1826. Meskouris K. (2000): Structural Dynamics: models, methods, examples. Berlin : Ernsted. prEN 1991-1-1:2001: Actions on structures, Part 1-1: general actions, densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings - Final Draft. prEN 1992-1:2001: Design of concrete. Part 1: general rules and rules for buildings – Draft n° 2. prEN 1993-1-1:2001: Design of steel structures. Part 1.1: general rules - Draft n° 2. prEN 1994-1-1:2001: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings – Draft n° 3. prEN 1998-1:2002: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings - Draft n°5.
Page 1 and 2:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanic
Page 3 and 4:
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI TRENTO D
Page 6:
Ai miei genitori
Page 10 and 11:
INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION...............
Page 12 and 13:
INDEX iii 4.10.3 Results of the PsD
Page 14 and 15:
1.1 Introduction 1 1 INTRODUCTION I
Page 16 and 17:
1. INTRODUCTION imposes precise con
Page 18 and 19:
1. INTRODUCTION joints whilst 2D mo
Page 20 and 21:
7 2 DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC RESPONSE
Page 22 and 23:
2. DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC RESPONSE O
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
3. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF BOLTED END
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRE
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135: 4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRE
Page 188 and 189: 5. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC COLUMNS
Page 234 and 235:
5. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC COLUMNS
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
6. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262:
show all

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?