10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />

The possible factors that have influenced <strong>the</strong> overestimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> design<br />

overstrength factor should be:<br />

• <strong>the</strong> partial safety factors used during <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure;<br />

• <strong>the</strong> design action amplification for accidental torsional effects;<br />

• <strong>the</strong> interstorey drift limits that should be satisfied in <strong>the</strong> design;<br />

• <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> design strength <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual strength value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

160<br />

materials;<br />

4.10 Pseudo-Dynamic tests on <strong>the</strong> prototype structure<br />

It is worthwhile to emphasize that quasi-static cyclic loading tests are no doubt <strong>the</strong><br />

most effective tests to acquire data on <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure, such as <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum resistance <strong>and</strong> ductility. None<strong>the</strong>less, to evaluate <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

structure in terms <strong>of</strong> complex hysteretic <strong>behaviour</strong> under earthquake-like loading<br />

pseudo-dynamic tests (PsD) are needed. Pre-test analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specimen <strong>and</strong><br />

post-test comparisons will be performed.<br />

Basing on <strong>the</strong> Performance Based Seismic Engineering (PBSE) method, <strong>the</strong><br />

values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peak ground acceleration (PGA) employed for <strong>the</strong> pseudo-dynamic<br />

tests were chosen, as reported in Table 4.9.<br />

PsD Tests PGA [g] OBJECTIVES<br />

1 0,10 Elastic Test<br />

2 0,25 Serviceability Limit State: SLS<br />

3 1,40<br />

Ultimate Limit State: ULS (joints’<br />

maximum rotation equal to 35 mrad)<br />

4 1,80 Collapse Limit State CLS<br />

Table 4.9. Values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PGA’s for <strong>the</strong> pseudo-dynamic tests<br />

1. Snap back PsD test with a value <strong>of</strong> acceleration equal to 0.1g was performed<br />

to measure dynamic elastic properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frame, viz. eigenvalues,<br />

eigenvectors <strong>and</strong> equivalent viscous damping as well as to verify <strong>the</strong> precision<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PsD algorithm.<br />

2. The objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second test was to lead <strong>the</strong> structure to <strong>the</strong> elastic limit, so<br />

as provided by <strong>the</strong> EC8 for <strong>the</strong> structural Serviceability Limit State. As a result,<br />

<strong>the</strong> basic vertical- <strong>and</strong> lateral force resisting system <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure<br />

substantially retain original strength <strong>and</strong> stiffness. Only limited structural

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!