Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />
· <strong>the</strong> maximum rotation <strong>and</strong> local damage in <strong>the</strong> joints;<br />
· <strong>the</strong> local damage in <strong>the</strong> columns;<br />
· <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ratio between <strong>the</strong> input energy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> total hysteretic<br />
energy dissipated.<br />
After <strong>the</strong> elaboration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numerical analyses, <strong>the</strong> accelerogram A-14 was<br />
chosen because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>high</strong>est level <strong>of</strong> damage induced in <strong>the</strong> joints <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower<br />
values <strong>of</strong> damage in <strong>the</strong> columns. This last parameter was taken into account in<br />
order to avoid dangerous global collapse due to <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> stability at <strong>the</strong> base<br />
level. The main characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accelerogram A-14 are reported in Figure<br />
4.50.<br />
a [m/sec 2 ]<br />
spost. [m]<br />
5.00<br />
4.00<br />
3.00<br />
2.00<br />
1.00<br />
0.00<br />
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00<br />
-1.00<br />
-2.00<br />
-3.00<br />
-4.00<br />
-5.00<br />
0.15<br />
0.10<br />
0.05<br />
time [sec]<br />
0.00<br />
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00<br />
-0.05<br />
-0.10<br />
-0.15<br />
Sa [m/sec 2 ]<br />
12.00<br />
10.00<br />
8.00<br />
6.00<br />
4.00<br />
2.00<br />
0.00<br />
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00<br />
(a) (b)<br />
time [sec]<br />
vel. [m/sec]<br />
0.40<br />
0.30<br />
0.20<br />
0.10<br />
-0.10<br />
-0.20<br />
-0.30<br />
-0.40<br />
T [sec]<br />
0.00<br />
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00<br />
time [sec]<br />
(c) (d)<br />
Figure 4.50. (a) Accelerogram A-14 employed for <strong>the</strong> analyses; (b) Elastic response<br />
spectrum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accelerogram A-14 with ξ equal to 5%; (c) Integrated base<br />
displacements after <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> baseline correction; (d) Integrated base<br />
velocity after <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> baseline correction<br />
Main results<br />
The pushover <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> incremental dynamic analysis was performed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />
compared. Hereinafter <strong>the</strong> main results are reported in Table 4.7, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />
obtained response curves are plotted in Figure 4.51. The uniform <strong>and</strong> triangular<br />
curves <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pushover analysis represent <strong>the</strong> upper <strong>and</strong> lower limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
response curve obtained by <strong>the</strong> IDA (Antoniou et al, 2002). Moreover, in our case,<br />
157