Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />
4.9 Numerical analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype structure<br />
The <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype structure described above was simulated by means<br />
<strong>of</strong> a 2D numerical model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main frame. All <strong>the</strong> constitutive elements, i.e.<br />
composite beams, composite partially encased columns, base joints, were<br />
modelled by using <strong>the</strong>ir actual geometrical <strong>and</strong> mechanical characteristics.<br />
Moreover, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results obtained from <strong>the</strong> analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tested<br />
specimens, it was possible to calibrate <strong>the</strong> analytical model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> semi-rigid partial<br />
strength joint, both for <strong>the</strong> exterior <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> interior configuration. As said before,<br />
<strong>the</strong> composite beam-to-column joint is modelled using a rotational spring to<br />
simulate <strong>the</strong> connections <strong>and</strong> a rectangular articulated polygon with a translational<br />
spring simulating <strong>the</strong> column web panel. Due to <strong>the</strong> inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analytical<br />
model obtained by applying <strong>the</strong> component method (Eurocode 3, 2001), <strong>the</strong><br />
experimental response was reproduced by means <strong>of</strong> a hysteretic Bouc-Wen model<br />
with damage rules implemented in <strong>the</strong> program IDARC 2D (Valles et al, 1996): <strong>the</strong><br />
smooth hysteretic model <strong>of</strong> Sivaselvan <strong>and</strong> Reinhorn (1999). In Figure 4.46 a<br />
scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numerical model used for <strong>the</strong> simulations is represented.<br />
402 mm<br />
3098 mm<br />
402 mm<br />
2760 mm<br />
290 mm<br />
150<br />
242 mm 6748 mm<br />
262 mm<br />
4748 mm<br />
242 mm<br />
+6.85 m<br />
+3.35 m<br />
0.00 m<br />
Figure 4.46. Scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numerical model used for <strong>the</strong> simulations<br />
By means <strong>of</strong> this numerical model both <strong>the</strong> non-linear static pushover (NSP)<br />
analysis <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) have been conducted.<br />
Hereinafter, <strong>the</strong> main results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se analyses will be discussed. The results <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se analyses in term <strong>of</strong> maximum plastic rotation at <strong>the</strong> joint, total amount <strong>of</strong><br />
dissipated energy <strong>and</strong> cumulated damage in <strong>the</strong> dissipative zones, have permitted<br />
to choose <strong>the</strong> correct accelerogram to impose on <strong>the</strong> prototype structure in <strong>the</strong><br />
ELSA laboratory by means <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pseudo-Dynamic (PsD) technique.