10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />

4.9 Numerical analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype structure<br />

The <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype structure described above was simulated by means<br />

<strong>of</strong> a 2D numerical model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main frame. All <strong>the</strong> constitutive elements, i.e.<br />

composite beams, composite partially encased columns, base joints, were<br />

modelled by using <strong>the</strong>ir actual geometrical <strong>and</strong> mechanical characteristics.<br />

Moreover, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results obtained from <strong>the</strong> analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tested<br />

specimens, it was possible to calibrate <strong>the</strong> analytical model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> semi-rigid partial<br />

strength joint, both for <strong>the</strong> exterior <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> interior configuration. As said before,<br />

<strong>the</strong> composite beam-to-column joint is modelled using a rotational spring to<br />

simulate <strong>the</strong> connections <strong>and</strong> a rectangular articulated polygon with a translational<br />

spring simulating <strong>the</strong> column web panel. Due to <strong>the</strong> inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analytical<br />

model obtained by applying <strong>the</strong> component method (Eurocode 3, 2001), <strong>the</strong><br />

experimental response was reproduced by means <strong>of</strong> a hysteretic Bouc-Wen model<br />

with damage rules implemented in <strong>the</strong> program IDARC 2D (Valles et al, 1996): <strong>the</strong><br />

smooth hysteretic model <strong>of</strong> Sivaselvan <strong>and</strong> Reinhorn (1999). In Figure 4.46 a<br />

scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numerical model used for <strong>the</strong> simulations is represented.<br />

402 mm<br />

3098 mm<br />

402 mm<br />

2760 mm<br />

290 mm<br />

150<br />

242 mm 6748 mm<br />

262 mm<br />

4748 mm<br />

242 mm<br />

+6.85 m<br />

+3.35 m<br />

0.00 m<br />

Figure 4.46. Scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numerical model used for <strong>the</strong> simulations<br />

By means <strong>of</strong> this numerical model both <strong>the</strong> non-linear static pushover (NSP)<br />

analysis <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) have been conducted.<br />

Hereinafter, <strong>the</strong> main results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se analyses will be discussed. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se analyses in term <strong>of</strong> maximum plastic rotation at <strong>the</strong> joint, total amount <strong>of</strong><br />

dissipated energy <strong>and</strong> cumulated damage in <strong>the</strong> dissipative zones, have permitted<br />

to choose <strong>the</strong> correct accelerogram to impose on <strong>the</strong> prototype structure in <strong>the</strong><br />

ELSA laboratory by means <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pseudo-Dynamic (PsD) technique.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!