10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />

total rotations <strong>of</strong> CJ-INT reach values greater than 50 mrad both under sagging<br />

<strong>and</strong> hogging bending moment, implying a suitable ductile <strong>behaviour</strong> for <strong>high</strong> ductile<br />

(class H) structures in <strong>seismic</strong> applications (Eurocode 8, 2002).<br />

CONCRETE STRESS (MPa)<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Exterior Complete Joint CJ-EXT<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />

0 25 50 75 100 125 150<br />

ROTATION θ (mrad)<br />

Figure 4.25. Concrete stress vs. global rotation in CJ-INT<br />

Both <strong>the</strong> monotonic <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyclic test were performed. In <strong>the</strong> monotonic test an<br />

imposed displacement load that would produce compression in <strong>the</strong> concrete slab<br />

was selected. The moment vs. plastic rotation <strong>of</strong> a beam-column assembly, <strong>the</strong><br />

moment vs. plastic rotation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> composite beam connection, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> shear vs.<br />

plastic distortion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> column web panel are shown in <strong>the</strong> following Figures. The<br />

joint <strong>behaviour</strong>, <strong>and</strong> in particular <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concrete slab in<br />

compression, is very similar to that obtained for <strong>the</strong> interior joint CJ-INT. Also in this<br />

case, as shown in Figure 4.26, <strong>the</strong> crushing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concrete in compression around<br />

<strong>the</strong> column flange brings about <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> resistance in <strong>the</strong> global joint response.<br />

The same phenomenon is evident in <strong>the</strong> <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> connection (see Figure<br />

4.27) <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> response <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> column web panel (see Figure 4.28), that<br />

distortion alone represents more than <strong>the</strong> 64% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total joint rotation.<br />

The <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exterior joint during <strong>the</strong> cyclic test resulted different from that<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interior joint. Under hogging bending moment, <strong>the</strong> exterior portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

concrete slab in compression was able to absorb large plastic deformations with<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> evident cracks at an inclination <strong>of</strong> 45 degree, as shown in Figure 4.29.<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!