10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />

4.5 Seismic design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> composite joint<br />

For moment resisting frame structures, <strong>the</strong> maximum structural ductility is attained<br />

through <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> global mechanisms (Gioncu et al., 2002). To this end, it is<br />

necessary to foresee sufficient overstrength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> columns satisfying <strong>the</strong> relation:<br />

where<br />

110<br />

M ≥ 1.3 ⋅ M<br />

( 4.3 )<br />

Rc Rb<br />

M Rc is <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> moments corresponding to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

design values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resisting moments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> columns;<br />

M Rb is <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> moments corresponding to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

design values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resisting moments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> partial strength<br />

joints.<br />

The ductile <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> joints is guaranteed by defining an appropriate<br />

hierarchy <strong>of</strong> resistance for each component. In this respect, with reference to<br />

sagging moments, <strong>the</strong> end-plate <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> column flange under bending as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> column web panel in shear have to be considered ductile components;<br />

whereas <strong>the</strong> concrete slab under compression <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> bolts under tension are<br />

assumed to be brittle.<br />

With regard to hogging moments, <strong>the</strong> steel rebars under tension <strong>and</strong>, once again,<br />

<strong>the</strong> end-plate <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> column flange under bending, as well as <strong>the</strong> column web<br />

panel under shear are considered ductile components; while <strong>the</strong> column web panel<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> beam flanges under compression are assumed to be brittle. Brittle failure<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bolts in tension before yielding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end plate <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> column flange<br />

can be easily averted by satisfying <strong>the</strong> following relation:<br />

f<br />

t ≥ 0.36 ⋅d ⋅ ub<br />

( 4.4 )<br />

f<br />

y<br />

where t is <strong>the</strong> thickness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end plate or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> column flange; d <strong>and</strong> fub are <strong>the</strong><br />

nominal diameter <strong>and</strong> ultimate tensile stress <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bolts, respectively; <strong>and</strong> fy <strong>the</strong><br />

yielding stress <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> base materials <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> considered component (prEN 1993-1,<br />

2000). For <strong>the</strong> remaining components, we applied <strong>the</strong> capacity design according to<br />

Table 4.2 <strong>and</strong> Table 4.3, respectively. It is also necessary to ensure that <strong>the</strong> joint<br />

possesses adequate resistance <strong>and</strong> rotational capacity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!