10.06.2013 Views

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

Analysis and modelling of the seismic behaviour of high ... - Ingegneria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PARTIAL-STRENGTH COMPOSITE JOINTS<br />

For <strong>the</strong>se conditions, S = 1.0 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reference periods TB, TC, <strong>and</strong> TD are<br />

respectively equal to 0.05 s, 0.25 s, <strong>and</strong> 1.2 s. The period T1 for <strong>the</strong> structure was<br />

calculated with <strong>the</strong> formula: T1 = 0.05·H 0.75 , with H = 7.5 m (total structure height),<br />

giving T1 = 0.22 s. The value <strong>of</strong> Sd (0.22 s) = 0.167.<br />

The <strong>seismic</strong> weight at each level includes <strong>the</strong> total gravity loads <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> following<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> imposed live load: 48% at <strong>the</strong> first level (φ= 0.8, ψ2i = 0.6) <strong>and</strong> 60%<br />

at <strong>the</strong> second level ((φ= 1.0, ψ2i = 0.6). The resulting total <strong>seismic</strong> weight, W,<br />

including <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structural members is given in Table 4.1. In this<br />

calculation, <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> a 3.5 m <strong>and</strong> a 1.75 m long column segments were<br />

applied respectively at <strong>the</strong> first <strong>and</strong> second levels. Assuming rigid diaphragm<br />

response, <strong>the</strong> <strong>seismic</strong> weight was divided equally between <strong>the</strong> 5 moment resisting<br />

frames, resulting in W = 552 kN/frame. The parameter in Eq. (4.2) is equal to<br />

0.85 because T1 < 2 TC. Substituting <strong>the</strong>se values, <strong>the</strong> base shear, Fb, is equal to<br />

78.2 kN per frame. In Table 4.1, <strong>the</strong> base shear force was distributed at each level<br />

using Eq. (4.1) <strong>and</strong> assuming mi = Wi/g.<br />

Level<br />

z<br />

(m)<br />

wd<br />

(kPa)<br />

ψewL<br />

(kPa)<br />

TOTAL W<br />

(KN)<br />

W / Frame<br />

(kN)<br />

F / Frame<br />

(kN)<br />

2 7.0 3.94 3.00 1398 280 52.6<br />

1 3.5 3.94 2.40 1361 272 25.6<br />

2759 552 78.2<br />

Table 4.1. Calculation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>seismic</strong> weights <strong>and</strong> <strong>seismic</strong> loads (torsion excluded)<br />

The design was performed only for one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interior moment resisting frames.<br />

Accidental torsion was included in <strong>the</strong> design <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> most critical frames are<br />

those located at 3.0 m from <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure. For <strong>the</strong>se frames, an<br />

amplification factor, , equal to 1.15 (= 1.0 + 0.6·3.0/12.0) was used. Therefore, <strong>the</strong><br />

final <strong>seismic</strong> loads were: 60.5 kN <strong>and</strong> 29.4 kN at levels 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 with a total base<br />

shear <strong>of</strong> 89.9 kN. In <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frames, <strong>the</strong>se loads were combined with <strong>the</strong><br />

total gravity dead load <strong>and</strong> 60% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> imposed live loads.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!