Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 46 - arkisto.gsf.fi
Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 46 - arkisto.gsf.fi
Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 46 - arkisto.gsf.fi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Geological</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finland</strong>, <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> <strong>46</strong><br />
Tiit Hang, Peeter Talviste, Raul Reinson and Marko Kohv<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> varved clays in Pärnu area<br />
Over the entire study area, the hummocky upper<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> the Late Weichselian bluish-grey loamy<br />
till is covered by glaciolacustrine varved clay or silt<br />
(Fig. 1). Glaci<strong>of</strong>l uvial deposits on top <strong>of</strong> the till have<br />
been only locally reported. The maximum thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> varved clay in the Pärnu area is 30 m, but on average<br />
between 5–9 m. Locally rapid changes in clay<br />
thickness are due to the underlying topography. The<br />
upper surface <strong>of</strong> the clay dips towards the south at an<br />
altitude <strong>of</strong> –8 m a.s.l. approximately 5 km <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />
and –2.5/–3 m a.s.l. at the current coastline <strong>of</strong> Pärnu<br />
Bay. At the distance <strong>of</strong> ca. 2 km north <strong>of</strong> coastline,<br />
the altitude <strong>of</strong> the clay surface rapidly changes from<br />
zero to 4 m a.s.l..<br />
Grain-size<br />
Clay and silt fraction dominate in the grain-size<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> proglacial clays in the Pärnu area<br />
(Fig. 3). With few exceptions, a common clay tex-<br />
82<br />
RESULTS<br />
ture exceeding 60% is typical for the winter layers<br />
through the studied sections (Fig. 3A). Data<br />
points expressing the texture <strong>of</strong> the summer layers<br />
is grouped towards the textural class <strong>of</strong> silt but is<br />
more scattered compared to the data <strong>of</strong> the winter<br />
layers (Fig. 3A). Currently analysed massive<br />
diamicton has the coarsest grain-size plotted in Fig.<br />
3A. Earlier grain-size analysis <strong>of</strong> mean samples<br />
(different seasonal layers included in one sample)<br />
support the current results (Fig. 3B) as the samples<br />
are closely grouped within the textural classes <strong>of</strong> silt<br />
and clay. It is obvious that the analysis <strong>of</strong> annual<br />
or multi-annual samples clearly underestimates the<br />
true content <strong>of</strong> clay and silt fraction in the deposit<br />
(Fig. 3). However, the analysed section PB-12-03<br />
(Fig. 3A) probably infl uences the results as only this<br />
section contains clay unit E. Results <strong>of</strong> multi-annual<br />
sample analysis (Fig. 3B) clearly demonstrate vertical<br />
changes in grain-size composition (Fig. 3B) as<br />
the content <strong>of</strong> silt fraction increases and the clay<br />
Fig. 3. Triangular plots <strong>of</strong> the grain–size composition <strong>of</strong> studied sequences (A) and clay units discussed in the text (B). Analysed<br />
summer and winter layers (A) belong to the same varves. Note, the different scales on the plots. Location <strong>of</strong> the studied sequences<br />
see in Fig. 2.