09.06.2013 Views

Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 46 - arkisto.gsf.fi

Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 46 - arkisto.gsf.fi

Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 46 - arkisto.gsf.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Geological</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finland</strong>, <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> <strong>46</strong><br />

Tiit Hang, Peeter Talviste, Raul Reinson and Marko Kohv<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> varved clays in Pärnu area<br />

Over the entire study area, the hummocky upper<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the Late Weichselian bluish-grey loamy<br />

till is covered by glaciolacustrine varved clay or silt<br />

(Fig. 1). Glaci<strong>of</strong>l uvial deposits on top <strong>of</strong> the till have<br />

been only locally reported. The maximum thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> varved clay in the Pärnu area is 30 m, but on average<br />

between 5–9 m. Locally rapid changes in clay<br />

thickness are due to the underlying topography. The<br />

upper surface <strong>of</strong> the clay dips towards the south at an<br />

altitude <strong>of</strong> –8 m a.s.l. approximately 5 km <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />

and –2.5/–3 m a.s.l. at the current coastline <strong>of</strong> Pärnu<br />

Bay. At the distance <strong>of</strong> ca. 2 km north <strong>of</strong> coastline,<br />

the altitude <strong>of</strong> the clay surface rapidly changes from<br />

zero to 4 m a.s.l..<br />

Grain-size<br />

Clay and silt fraction dominate in the grain-size<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> proglacial clays in the Pärnu area<br />

(Fig. 3). With few exceptions, a common clay tex-<br />

82<br />

RESULTS<br />

ture exceeding 60% is typical for the winter layers<br />

through the studied sections (Fig. 3A). Data<br />

points expressing the texture <strong>of</strong> the summer layers<br />

is grouped towards the textural class <strong>of</strong> silt but is<br />

more scattered compared to the data <strong>of</strong> the winter<br />

layers (Fig. 3A). Currently analysed massive<br />

diamicton has the coarsest grain-size plotted in Fig.<br />

3A. Earlier grain-size analysis <strong>of</strong> mean samples<br />

(different seasonal layers included in one sample)<br />

support the current results (Fig. 3B) as the samples<br />

are closely grouped within the textural classes <strong>of</strong> silt<br />

and clay. It is obvious that the analysis <strong>of</strong> annual<br />

or multi-annual samples clearly underestimates the<br />

true content <strong>of</strong> clay and silt fraction in the deposit<br />

(Fig. 3). However, the analysed section PB-12-03<br />

(Fig. 3A) probably infl uences the results as only this<br />

section contains clay unit E. Results <strong>of</strong> multi-annual<br />

sample analysis (Fig. 3B) clearly demonstrate vertical<br />

changes in grain-size composition (Fig. 3B) as<br />

the content <strong>of</strong> silt fraction increases and the clay<br />

Fig. 3. Triangular plots <strong>of</strong> the grain–size composition <strong>of</strong> studied sequences (A) and clay units discussed in the text (B). Analysed<br />

summer and winter layers (A) belong to the same varves. Note, the different scales on the plots. Location <strong>of</strong> the studied sequences<br />

see in Fig. 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!