<strong>Geological</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finland</strong>, <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> <strong>46</strong> Raimo Sutinen, Mari Jakonen, Pauliina Liwata and Eija Hyvönen Eskers and tunnel valleys have been understood to be meltwater forms, but the organization <strong>of</strong> these landforms, however, exhibits evidence <strong>of</strong> different meltdown drainage patterns <strong>of</strong> Pleistocene ice sheets. The conceptual model regards eskers as products <strong>of</strong> time-transgressive glaci<strong>of</strong>l uvial deposition within close proximity <strong>of</strong> the retreating ice margin (Banerjee & McDonald 1975). On a subcontinental scale, arboreal esker systems also show time-transgressive features (Clark & Walder 1994). Eskers are commonly associated with anastomosing tunnel valleys that are found to be common in regions typi<strong>fi</strong> ed by <strong>fi</strong> ne-grained tills derived from sedimentary bedrock (Wright 1973, Clark & Walder 1994). It is assumed that high-velocity fl ood event(s) preceded the evolution <strong>of</strong> eskers found in the tunnel valleys (Wright 1973, Kozlowski et al. 2005). Morphological evidence has also shown that catastrophic sheetfl ood events are capable <strong>of</strong> eroding large regions out <strong>of</strong> pervasive cover <strong>of</strong> unconsolidated sediments (Kor & Cowell 1998). The anastomosing network <strong>of</strong> tunnel valleys, esker tracks or sheetfl oods are evidently attributed to subglacial lakes (Wright 1973, Shaw We compiled DEM and low altitude AGR (γ K ) to outline the anastomosing network <strong>of</strong> sheetfl ow tracks within an area <strong>of</strong> 100 by 100 km in east-central Finnish Lapland (Fig. 1). The time-stability <strong>of</strong> spatial structures in the soil γ K (Hyvönen & Sutinen 1998) implies that the terrain anisotropy, whether due to glacial streamlining or sheetfl ow outbursts, is revealed by the AGR-γ K . The regimes <strong>of</strong> low soil volumetric water content (0v), such as sheetfl ow esker ridges, are indicated by high γ K -signatures, while low γ K -signatures (high 0v) typify topographic lows, <strong>of</strong>ten with organic or <strong>fi</strong> ne-grained materials (Hyvönen et al. 2003, Sutinen et al. 2005). The DEM-AGR enhancement <strong>of</strong> the sheetfl ow associations was viewed closer in the subset areas <strong>of</strong> Tanhua and Suoltijoki (Fig. 1.). Compilation <strong>of</strong> AM and DEM was applied to search candidate lines to represent neotectonic faulting. The coincidental appearance <strong>of</strong> topographic escarpments and AM-anomalies, showing, for example, pre-existing hydrothermal alteration zones, 56 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS & Kvill 1984, Sutinen 1992, Kor & Cowell 1998, Sjogren et al. 2002, Kozlowski et al. 2005), but the outburst release mechanisms <strong>of</strong> former subglacial meltwater bodies have remained unknown. Radar evidence has indicated large subglacial lakes (e.g. Lake Vostok, 500 by 300 km in size) beneath the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) (Robin et al. 1970, Kapitsa et al. 1996, Siegert 2000), hence potential water volumes for tunnel valley formation evidently existed beneath the former Pleistocene ice sheets. Following the concept <strong>of</strong> glacio-seismotectonics at the margin <strong>of</strong> FIS (Stewart et al. 2000), we suspect that large-magnitude seismic impacts (Arvidsson 1996, Wu et al. 1999) have been part <strong>of</strong> an abrupt release <strong>of</strong> subglacial water bodies as outburst sheetfl ows beneath the FIS. In this study, we present morphological/geophysical evidence that neotectonic fault instability likely contributed not only to paleolandslides (Sutinen 1992, 2005, Sutinen et al. this issue), but also to glaci<strong>of</strong>l uvial landform genesis shortly after the Younger Dryas (YD) episode in Finnish Lapland. marks potential zones where faults were likely reactivated within the glacio-seismotectonic subsidence-rebound processes (Arvidsson 1996, Fjeldskaar et al. 2000, Stewart et al. 2002). However, not all escarpments are neotectonic and not every AManomaly is present at sites with neotectonic faults (Ojala et al. 2004). Thus, glacio-morphological investigations are <strong>of</strong>ten needed to verify neotectonic origin (Lagerbäck 1990, Dehls et al. 2000). For the time-stratigraphic purposes, additional data on the preferred orientation <strong>of</strong> till(s) were acquired by applying non-destructive azimuthal measurements <strong>of</strong> apparent electrical conductivity (σa) (Taylor & Fleming 1988, Penttinen et al. 1999, Sutinen et al. this issue). We determined the maximum σaanisotropy (orientation) <strong>of</strong> the tills at 12 sites with a Geonics EM38 (Geonics Ltd. Mississauga, Ont. Canada) device designed to a depth range <strong>of</strong> 1.5-2 m (depending on material) in vertical coil position EM38(V). The <strong>fi</strong> eld campaign was carried out in August 2005.
<strong>Geological</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finland</strong>, <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> <strong>46</strong> Late Weichselian sheetfl ow drainage <strong>of</strong> subglacial Lokka ice lake Fig. 1. Anastomosing network <strong>of</strong> sheetfl ow tracks in the Lokka area, east-central Finnish Lapland. The Tanhua and Suoltijoki subsets are viewed in more detail in the text. The Tanhua fault line (tentatively Late Glacial Fault; LGF) shown with barbs turned towards the lower block. Descriptions <strong>of</strong> pre-Late Weichselian NE-W (top <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fi</strong> gure) and N-S (in the mid <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fi</strong> gure) oriented esker tracts were given in Sutinen (1992). 57
- Page 1:
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF FINLAND Specia
- Page 4 and 5:
Johansson, P. & Sarala, P. (eds.) 2
- Page 6 and 7:
4 CONTENTS Preface, Peter Johansson
- Page 8 and 9: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 11 and 12: Applied Quaternary research in the
- Page 13 and 14: DRUMLINS IN KUUSAMO AND RANUA In Ko
- Page 15 and 16: RIBBED MORAINES IN SOUTHERN FINNISH
- Page 17 and 18: ued fl owing from west to east but
- Page 19: Sarala, P. 2005a. Glacial morpholog
- Page 22 and 23: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 24 and 25: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 26 and 27: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 28 and 29: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 30 and 31: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 32 and 33: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 34 and 35: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 36 and 37: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 38 and 39: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 41 and 42: Applied Quaternary research in the
- Page 43 and 44: Pleistocene deposits in southern Li
- Page 45 and 46: Heavy minerals Medininkai Upland Ei
- Page 47 and 48: The South Lithuanian phase of glaci
- Page 49 and 50: Applied Quaternary research in the
- Page 51 and 52: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 53 and 54: Fig. 4. Lateral drainage channels o
- Page 55 and 56: for dating. The deglaciation of nor
- Page 57: Applied Quaternary research in the
- Page 61 and 62: In Lokka, the sheetfl ow tracks wer
- Page 63 and 64: Fig. 5. A compilation of low altitu
- Page 65 and 66: Applied Quaternary research in the
- Page 67 and 68: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 69 and 70: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 71 and 72: Applied Quaternary research in the
- Page 73 and 74: deposited over the fi lled channel,
- Page 75 and 76: Michigan Lobe as it advanced into t
- Page 77 and 78: Type IV Tunnel channels The Type IV
- Page 79: Attig, J. W., Mickelson, D. M. & Cl
- Page 82 and 83: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 84 and 85: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 86 and 87: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 88 and 89: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 90 and 91: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 92 and 93: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 94 and 95: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 96 and 97: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 98 and 99: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 100 and 101: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 102 and 103: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 104 and 105: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 106 and 107: Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 108 and 109:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 110 and 111:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 112 and 113:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 114 and 115:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 116 and 117:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 118 and 119:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 120 and 121:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 122 and 123:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 124 and 125:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 126 and 127:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 128 and 129:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 130 and 131:
128
- Page 132 and 133:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 134 and 135:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 136 and 137:
134
- Page 138 and 139:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 140 and 141:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 142 and 143:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 144 and 145:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 146 and 147:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 148 and 149:
146
- Page 150 and 151:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 152 and 153:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 154 and 155:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 156 and 157:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 158 and 159:
In summary, the northern part of th
- Page 160 and 161:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 162 and 163:
Geological Survey of Finland, Speci
- Page 168:
www.gtk. info@gtk. e Peribaltic Gro