09.06.2013 Views

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Two:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Destruction <strong>of</strong> Jewish Livelihoods, 1933–1938<br />

From Boycott to Expropriation<br />

For the period from 1933 until the pogrom in November 1938, the <strong>Jews</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Magdeburg</strong> experienced the same economic strangulation and social isolation as<br />

their co-religionists did elsewhere in Germany. 1 <strong>The</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

life <strong>of</strong> its Jewish community was attended to zealously by both the <strong>Nazi</strong> Party and<br />

the local authorities with the assistance <strong>of</strong> the city’s citizenry.<br />

<strong>The</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> individuals varied for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons. Business<br />

people and those self-employed <strong>of</strong>ten did not feel the effects as immediately as<br />

those who were salaried or civil servants or those pr<strong>of</strong>essionals whose livelihoods<br />

depended on governmental certification. Self-employed individuals operating<br />

businesses not requiring pr<strong>of</strong>essional certification could still exert some influence<br />

over their business lives, even as the situation grew progressively worse with<br />

constant defamations, boycotts and the eventual threat <strong>of</strong> looming ‘aryanisation.’<br />

This was not the case for salaried individuals and most pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, the majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> whom were forced to retrain or were reduced to impoverishment in the early<br />

years <strong>of</strong> the regime after having been dismissed or forced into retirement. In<br />

1 In the most thorough and recent study <strong>of</strong> the processes and practices <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

exclusion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Jews</strong> in Germany, Frank Bajohr has used the Jewish community <strong>of</strong><br />

Hamburg as a case study. In 1933 Hamburg’s Jewish community was the fourthlargest<br />

in Germany, with a population <strong>of</strong> 16,885 or 1.5% <strong>of</strong> the city’s population and<br />

was also one <strong>of</strong> the nation’s most affluent. Whilst it neither compares numerically,<br />

nor socio-economically to <strong>Magdeburg</strong>, Bajohr’s study provides a parallel to the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> the policies <strong>of</strong> ‘aryanisation.’ See Frank Bajohr, ‘Aryanization’ in<br />

Hamburg: <strong>The</strong> Economic Exclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jews</strong> and the Confiscation <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ir Property in<br />

<strong>Nazi</strong> Germany, 1933–1945 New York: Berghahn Books, 2002.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!