09.06.2013 Views

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

141<br />

confined to their terrorisation rather than their complete isolation and exclusion.<br />

From mid-1935, in the months leading up to the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Nuremberg<br />

Laws through to 1938, in addition to these behaviours, <strong>Jews</strong> were subjected<br />

publicly to exclusionary measures, designed to vilify and segregate<br />

simultaneously. 59 <strong>The</strong>se measures ranged from the full application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Nuremberg Laws to the introduction <strong>of</strong> accommodation hostels for <strong>Jews</strong> only, the<br />

revoking <strong>of</strong> hunting licences to <strong>Jews</strong>, the banning <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jews</strong> from public venues<br />

such as cinemas and public baths to the complete segregation for health reasons <strong>of</strong><br />

Jewish patients in public hospitals.<br />

All practices associated with day-to-day living increased in burden, whether it<br />

involved attempting to take public transport from one place to another or to<br />

<strong>under</strong>take routine shopping. By November 1938 <strong>Jews</strong> in <strong>Magdeburg</strong> were so<br />

isolated in their city that they avoided going out in public and, other than<br />

attending to necessary daily affairs, they remained either indoors or only in the<br />

company <strong>of</strong> other <strong>Jews</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y were effectively living in a ghetto without walls<br />

owing to the threats that surrounded them in non-Jewish space. By November<br />

1938 only two public meeting places remained for <strong>Jews</strong> in <strong>Magdeburg</strong> – the<br />

synagogue and the cemetery with its adjacent field.<br />

Interviewees’ perception <strong>of</strong> daily life in public supports the view <strong>of</strong> an initial<br />

transitional period <strong>of</strong> uncertainty. Both <strong>Jews</strong> and non-<strong>Jews</strong> in the city were unsure<br />

about many <strong>of</strong> the antisemitic measures in 1933 and attempted to go about their<br />

59 <strong>The</strong> cited phases and the ensuing levels <strong>of</strong> public exclusion and humiliation<br />

correspond to a study by Michael Wildt on the small Franconian Jewish community<br />

<strong>of</strong> Treuchtlingen. Whilst this community only numbered 119 <strong>Jews</strong> out <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 4,200 townspeople, owing to its regional nature and the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

anonymity <strong>Jews</strong> faced in such communities, many similarities exist between its<br />

situation and that <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Magdeburg</strong> community. See Michael Wildt, “Violence<br />

against <strong>Jews</strong> in Germany 1933–1939,” in Bankier, ed., op. cit., pp. 181–209.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!