09.06.2013 Views

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

Life_under_Siege_The_Jews_of_Magdeburg_under_Nazi_Rule.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Process <strong>of</strong> Aryanisation<br />

115<br />

‘Aryanisations’ in <strong>Magdeburg</strong> commenced as early as 1933. <strong>The</strong>y initially<br />

occurred in the form <strong>of</strong> ‘voluntary’ sales. 131 <strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> coercion and forced<br />

sales gathered momentum after the Nuremberg Laws. Sale prices in 1933 were<br />

still well below market value, but they were, nevertheless, better than the sale<br />

prices which Jewish vendors later experienced, as the acceleration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

displacement <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Jews</strong> from the city’s economic life gathered momentum. As<br />

the years progressed, sale prices plummeted. Those who gained principally were<br />

<strong>Nazi</strong> Party stalwarts and middle-class functionaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Nazi</strong> Party. 132 In April<br />

1938 approximately 60% <strong>of</strong> Jewish-owned businesses in the city had been<br />

‘aryanised.’<br />

In <strong>Magdeburg</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> ‘aryanisation’ conforms to the pattern observed<br />

throughout Germany with the figure <strong>of</strong> businesses ‘aryanised’ by 1935 being<br />

between 20% and 25% <strong>of</strong> those in existence in 1933. 133 In addition to the ongoing<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> boycotts and defamation in the local press, small businesses whose<br />

shops appeared especially attractive to local <strong>Nazi</strong> Party functionaries were slowly<br />

worn down and demoralised by various means. Claims that building and health<br />

regulations had been violated was one such ploy. An example <strong>of</strong> this was<br />

discussed in the previous section in the case <strong>of</strong> the stationer, ‘L. Sperling & Co.’.<br />

Another effective ploy occurred after the application <strong>of</strong> the Nuremberg Laws<br />

when a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jews</strong> were threatened with the accusation <strong>of</strong> ‘Rassenschande,’<br />

or, worse still, were arrested <strong>under</strong> suspicion <strong>of</strong> the charge. Through these means<br />

131 Barkai, op. cit., p. 69.<br />

132 Frank Bajohr, “<strong>The</strong> Beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> ‘Aryanization’: Hamburg as a Case Study,”<br />

Yad Vashem Studies, vol. XXVI, 1998, pp. 173–201.<br />

133 Barkai, op. cit., p. 70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!