Enhanced Polymer Passivation Layer for Wafer Level Chip Scale ...

Enhanced Polymer Passivation Layer for Wafer Level Chip Scale ... Enhanced Polymer Passivation Layer for Wafer Level Chip Scale ...

etd.auburn.edu
from etd.auburn.edu More from this publisher
09.06.2013 Views

the nominal thickness of the resist near the center due to the dynamics of the spin coating process. In order to achieve better contact between the photomask and the coating layer, it was strongly recommended to remove the edge bead. Edge bead removal is performed immediately after spin coat by directing a stream of acetone near the edge of the wafer while it is spinning. Also, due to the opaqueness of this SolderBrace material, it was necessary to scrape off some of the film along the outer edge of the wafer to expose some features for accurate alignment. 5. Mask alignment and exposure: The mask (see Figure 3.8) was aligned to the first layer pattern on the wafer. Once the mask was accurately aligned, the SolderBrace material was exposed through the pattern on the mask with a high intensity ultraviolet light. 25 seconds continuous exposure time was used. If the sample were over exposed, the film would have a very light pink/brown color after the post exposure bake step and the apertures could not be completely developed out or the opening sizes would be very small. If the sample was under exposure, it would cause a delamination problem due to poor adhesion between the wafer and SolderBrace material, or the material residue could flow back into the opening after development. These films were filled with silica, and the light needed to "penetrate" through. Without a sufficiently strong light source, the light would be reflected from the silic and the material underneath would not crosslink. The fact that the resin flowed back suggested that the resin closest to the wafer was not cured. If properly crosslinked, the film was a gel, unable to revert back to a liquid, regardless of solvent or heat. In order to get the small features in the pattern, care had to be taken not to over expose or under expose the material. Figure 3.9 is a depiction of different aperture sizes obtained vs. exposure time. 52

6. Post-UV exposure bake: This step was accomplished at 100 o C for 5min on a hotplate to cure and crosslink the material right after the exposure. Without this step, the resin will not cure all the way, which will lead to the bad development result. Since the photo initiator of the SolderBrace material is thermally unstable, the processing conditions are critical. Therefore, a thermocouple was attached to the sample to make sure the hotplate was at the proper temperature. +/- 5 o C would not change the cure, but a 10-15 o C change might, and the drying procedure in particular is sensitive to large changes in temperature. Too hot and the film will have more internal stress and cracks while too cool and the film remains tacky. Figure 3.8 Pattern for SolderBrace coating 53

the nominal thickness of the resist near the center due to the dynamics of the spin coating<br />

process. In order to achieve better contact between the photomask and the coating layer,<br />

it was strongly recommended to remove the edge bead. Edge bead removal is per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

immediately after spin coat by directing a stream of acetone near the edge of the wafer<br />

while it is spinning. Also, due to the opaqueness of this SolderBrace material, it was<br />

necessary to scrape off some of the film along the outer edge of the wafer to expose some<br />

features <strong>for</strong> accurate alignment.<br />

5. Mask alignment and exposure: The mask (see Figure 3.8) was aligned to the first layer<br />

pattern on the wafer. Once the mask was accurately aligned, the SolderBrace material<br />

was exposed through the pattern on the mask with a high intensity ultraviolet light. 25<br />

seconds continuous exposure time was used. If the sample were over exposed, the film<br />

would have a very light pink/brown color after the post exposure bake step and the<br />

apertures could not be completely developed out or the opening sizes would be very<br />

small. If the sample was under exposure, it would cause a delamination problem due to<br />

poor adhesion between the wafer and SolderBrace material, or the material residue could<br />

flow back into the opening after development. These films were filled with silica, and the<br />

light needed to "penetrate" through. Without a sufficiently strong light source, the light<br />

would be reflected from the silic and the material underneath would not crosslink. The<br />

fact that the resin flowed back suggested that the resin closest to the wafer was not cured.<br />

If properly crosslinked, the film was a gel, unable to revert back to a liquid, regardless of<br />

solvent or heat. In order to get the small features in the pattern, care had to be taken not<br />

to over expose or under expose the material. Figure 3.9 is a depiction of different aperture<br />

sizes obtained vs. exposure time.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!