09.06.2013 Views

Complementary Alternative Cardiovascular Medicine

Complementary Alternative Cardiovascular Medicine

Complementary Alternative Cardiovascular Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 / Herbs and Supplements 17<br />

One problem with standardizing extracts is that we often do not know<br />

which chemicals in an herb contribute to its health benefits. Only a few<br />

of the hundreds of herbs on the market are standardized to known active<br />

principles. Examples include kava, senna, ginseng, ephedra, cola, and<br />

maté. Other extracts are standardized to “marker” compounds, which<br />

may not be critical to the plant’s effectiveness. Markers are chosen based<br />

on some evidence that if the extract contains enough of the marker compound,<br />

it will be effective. St. John’s wort is a good example. Its standardized<br />

extracts have well-researched antidepressant effects, despite<br />

that the marker compound to which extracts are standardized, hypericin,<br />

is not the “active principle” in this antidepressant herb (5). However,<br />

clinical trials prove that an extract (made in a certain way) that has<br />

enough hypericin is effective against depression (6). Whichever chemical<br />

or chemicals are responsible for this effect are extracted along with<br />

the hypericin, so the hypericin serves as a good marker.<br />

One of the risks of standardizing extracts to a single chemical compound<br />

is the possibility of an unscrupulous manufacturer boosting the<br />

level of the marker compound with a cheap, synthetic chemical. This is<br />

called “spiking” and is believed to be uncommon for most herbs, partly<br />

because cheap synthetic sources of most marker compounds are not<br />

available. There is sound evidence of spiking in ephedra products (inexpensive<br />

ephedrine is available), but this is a dangerous practice for<br />

manufacturers because it is both unethical and illegal.<br />

A larger problem is that in independent tests, some products have<br />

failed to contain the levels of marker compounds that are stated on the<br />

label. In some cases, no marker compounds were found in these tests,<br />

indicating that the product may not have included any of the labeled<br />

herb. In either case, this could result from either poor quality control or<br />

intentional fraud.<br />

Hydroalcoholic Extracts (Tinctures)<br />

The simplest extracts on the market are hydroalcoholic extracts, sometimes<br />

called tinctures, which are sold in dropper bottles. These are usually<br />

labeled with a ratio that tells you how much of the herb is present in<br />

a given quantity of an extract. The ratio is a measure of the weight of herb<br />

(the first number) used to make a certain amount of extract (the second<br />

number). If 1 kg of herb is extracted to produce 1 kg of extract, the extract<br />

is a “one-to-one,” or 1/1, extract. An extract labeled 1/1 is roughly equivalent<br />

to an equal weight of the herb. One dropperful usually contains<br />

approx 1 mL of extract, which weighs approx 1 g, so 1 dropperful of a<br />

1/1 extract is approximately equal to 1 g of the herb. In a 1/5 extract, 1 g<br />

of herb is present in 5 g (5 mL) of extract. It takes 5 dropperfuls of a 1/5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!