ILLINOIS - The University of Illinois Board of Trustees

ILLINOIS - The University of Illinois Board of Trustees ILLINOIS - The University of Illinois Board of Trustees

trustees.uillinois.edu
from trustees.uillinois.edu More from this publisher
08.06.2013 Views

628 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Wune 19 President Forsyth announced that an executive session had been requested. EXECUTIVE SESSION The board considered the following items of business. Report on Settlement of Rice Foundation litigation (1) At the September 20, 1978, meeting of the Board of Trustees, settlement of the Rice Foundation litigation was authorized “on such terms as may be approved by members of the Executive Committee of the Board.” From the University’s stand- point the principal issue in all of the Rice Foundation litigation has been the validity of certain actions taken in 1974 purporting to amend the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Rice Foundation (the “1974 Bylaws”). Under the 1974 Bylaws the purposes of the Rice Foundation were restricted to rendering financial aid and support in the form of scholarships and grants to exceptional individuals pursuing studies in the fields of medicine and medical re- search at one of five named schools of medicine (Northwestern University; Loyola University; Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s; Michael Reese ; and the University of Illinois Medical School). Each institution was allowed to nominate fourth year students, students in graduate medical education, interns, and residents for the scholarships and grants. To the extent that the scholarships or grants in any year were less than the amounts required to be distributed by the Rice Foundation under the Internal Revenue Code, the balance was to be distributed equally among the five medical schools. The 1974 Bylaws provided that the members of the Rice Foundation would be five, one selected by each of the medical institutions. The Board of Directors would consist of nine persons, those beins the five members and four additional directors selected by them. By Board of Trustee action, Vice President Brady has been designated to be the University’s representative in all Rice Foundation matters. The Probate Division of the Du Page County Circuit Court had previously upheld the validity of the 1974 Bylaws but in October 1979 the Appellate Court of Illinois (Second District) reversed the lower court’s findings on the grounds that the issue was not properly litigated in the Probate Division. A proceeding in the Circuit Court of Cook County testing the validity of the 1974 Bylaws was set for trial on June 30, 1980. At a meeting on May 28, 1980, attended by the five counsels of the medical institutions and the co-counsel employed jointly by them, it was announced by Northwestern University that it had decided to discontinue its participation in all Rice Foundation litigation. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s indicated that it would join Northwestern in the discontinuancc. Loyola University and Michael Reese then adopted the same position. The four private institutions, led by Northwestern Uni- versity and Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s, reached agreement that their decisions to discontinue the litigation would be unconditional and that they would not request a money payment from the opposing side in connection with any such discon- tinuance. Subsequently it was proposed that the discontinuance be accomplished by the entry of a decree in the current Cook County Circuit Court litigation finding that the 1974 Bylaws were of no legal force or effect and that the current directors of the Rice Foundation (which do not include any representatives from the five medical institutions) were the proper and lawful directors thereof. In addition, the Rice Foundation and its current directors would furnish a covenant not to sue in favor of each medical institution, its trustees, officers, employees, and attorneys. Further, the Rice Foundation would advise each of the five medical institutions that they might, in due course, apply for grants from the Rice Foundation and

19801 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 629 their participation in prior litigation would have no consequence or import in the Rice Foundation’s consideration of those applications. The University’s one-fifth share of the expenses of the litigation through April 30 amounted to approximately $58,000. The University’s share of the May 1980 expenses is estimated at approximately $6,000. Co-counsel has advised that the costs of further proceedings through completion of the trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County case would be $75,000 to $85,000. The four privatc institutions would not participate in paying any of the latter amount. The co-counsel represented that in his view the likelihood of prevailing on the issue of the validity of the 1974 Bylaws was no better than 50150 and that undoubtedly the party who did not pre- vail would appeal the matter. In view of the positions taken by the other four medical institutions, the substantial additional expense which would be involved if the University were to continue the litigation on its own, and the uncertainty of the ultimate result, the university counsel and the vice president for administration, with the concurrence of the president of the University, recommended the discontinuance and settlement of the Rice Foundation litigation on the terms stated above. The members of the Executive Committee approved the recommmdation. This report was received for record. Acquisition of land for the Western Illinois Agricultural Research and Demonstration Center (2) On March 20, 1980, the Board of Trustees approved of the acquisition of two adjoining tracts of land in Hale Township, Warren County, for a site for the Western Illinois Agricultural Research and Demonstration Center (Soil Type “A”). One tract is of 40 acres (the Greenstreet property), and the owners have agreed to accept a price of $160,000. The other tract is of 120 acres (the Melton farm), whose owner has agreed to accept a price of $246,000, plus exchange of three small tracts of University-owned land - of approximately 20 acres each - near Carthage, Aledo, and Kewanee. The terms of these acquisitions are consistent with the board’s approval of March 20, 1980. In order to formalize the previoun action of the Board of Trustees, the presi- dent of the University, with the concurrence of the appropriate administrative officers, rccommends adoption of the following resolutions to accomplish the acquisition of the Greenstreet property and the Melton farm as outlined above. Funds have been appropriated to the Capital Development Board from Capital Development Bond funds (FY 1980) for the benefit of the University, subject to release by the governor. Resolution Authorizing Acquisition of 40-Acre Greenstreet Farm, Warren County, Illinois, as Part of the Site for the Western Illinois Agricultural Research Center Wherear, pursuant to authorization of The Board of Trustees of the Uni- versity of Illinois, a public corporation of the State of Illinois, with its principal office in the City of Urbana, in the County of Champaign and State of Illinois, hereinafter referred to as “University.” given at its meeting on March 20, 1980, the Comptroller and Secretary of this University have entered into an agreement on behalf of and in the name of this University with Willard Charles Greenstreet, R.R. # 1, Oquawka, Illinois, and Janet I. Greenstreet, R.R. #3, Monmouth, Illinois, previously married but now divorced, as Owners, and Security Savings and Loan Association, 220 East Broadway, Monmouth, Illinois, as Mortgagee, and both Owners and Mortgagee are hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Sellers,” under date of

628 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Wune 19<br />

President Forsyth announced that an executive session had been requested.<br />

EXECUTIVE SESSION<br />

<strong>The</strong> board considered the following items <strong>of</strong> business.<br />

Report on Settlement <strong>of</strong> Rice Foundation litigation<br />

(1) At the September 20, 1978, meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trustees</strong>, settlement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rice Foundation litigation was authorized “on such terms as may be approved by<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the Executive Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Board</strong>.” From the <strong>University</strong>’s stand-<br />

point the principal issue in all <strong>of</strong> the Rice Foundation litigation has been the validity<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain actions taken in 1974 purporting to amend the Articles <strong>of</strong> Incorporation<br />

and the Bylaws <strong>of</strong> the Rice Foundation (the “1974 Bylaws”).<br />

Under the 1974 Bylaws the purposes <strong>of</strong> the Rice Foundation were restricted<br />

to rendering financial aid and support in the form <strong>of</strong> scholarships and grants to<br />

exceptional individuals pursuing studies in the fields <strong>of</strong> medicine and medical re-<br />

search at one <strong>of</strong> five named schools <strong>of</strong> medicine (Northwestern <strong>University</strong>; Loyola<br />

<strong>University</strong>; Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s; Michael Reese ; and the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Illinois</strong> Medical School). Each institution was allowed to nominate fourth year<br />

students, students in graduate medical education, interns, and residents for the<br />

scholarships and grants. To the extent that the scholarships or grants in any year<br />

were less than the amounts required to be distributed by the Rice Foundation under<br />

the Internal Revenue Code, the balance was to be distributed equally among the<br />

five medical schools. <strong>The</strong> 1974 Bylaws provided that the members <strong>of</strong> the Rice<br />

Foundation would be five, one selected by each <strong>of</strong> the medical institutions. <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Directors would consist <strong>of</strong> nine persons, those beins the five members and<br />

four additional directors selected by them. By <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustee action, Vice<br />

President Brady has been designated to be the <strong>University</strong>’s representative in all<br />

Rice Foundation matters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Probate Division <strong>of</strong> the Du Page County Circuit Court had previously<br />

upheld the validity <strong>of</strong> the 1974 Bylaws but in October 1979 the Appellate Court<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Illinois</strong> (Second District) reversed the lower court’s findings on the grounds<br />

that the issue was not properly litigated in the Probate Division. A proceeding in<br />

the Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Cook County testing the validity <strong>of</strong> the 1974 Bylaws was set<br />

for trial on June 30, 1980.<br />

At a meeting on May 28, 1980, attended by the five counsels <strong>of</strong> the medical<br />

institutions and the co-counsel employed jointly by them, it was announced by<br />

Northwestern <strong>University</strong> that it had decided to discontinue its participation in all<br />

Rice Foundation litigation. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s indicated that it would<br />

join Northwestern in the discontinuancc. Loyola <strong>University</strong> and Michael Reese then<br />

adopted the same position. <strong>The</strong> four private institutions, led by Northwestern Uni-<br />

versity and Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s, reached agreement that their decisions to<br />

discontinue the litigation would be unconditional and that they would not request<br />

a money payment from the opposing side in connection with any such discon-<br />

tinuance.<br />

Subsequently it was proposed that the discontinuance be accomplished by the<br />

entry <strong>of</strong> a decree in the current Cook County Circuit Court litigation finding that<br />

the 1974 Bylaws were <strong>of</strong> no legal force or effect and that the current directors <strong>of</strong><br />

the Rice Foundation (which do not include any representatives from the five<br />

medical institutions) were the proper and lawful directors there<strong>of</strong>. In addition, the<br />

Rice Foundation and its current directors would furnish a covenant not to sue in<br />

favor <strong>of</strong> each medical institution, its trustees, <strong>of</strong>ficers, employees, and attorneys.<br />

Further, the Rice Foundation would advise each <strong>of</strong> the five medical institutions<br />

that they might, in due course, apply for grants from the Rice Foundation and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!