ILLINOIS - The University of Illinois Board of Trustees
ILLINOIS - The University of Illinois Board of Trustees ILLINOIS - The University of Illinois Board of Trustees
19791 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 199 such third parties during the last three months before the employee’s claim would be barred (January 24, 1979) and to retain out of any amount recovered any Workmen’s Compensation benefits paid by the University, attorneys’ fees and costs and expenses. Pursuant to previous delegations by the Board of Trustees, the university counsel has been given interim authorization to take such steps as are necessary or appropriate, including the employment of special counsel and the initiation of litigation, to defend the Workmen’s Compensation claim and to preserve the Uni- versity’s subrogation rights under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The univer- sity counsel has recommended that such authorization be ratified, approved and confirmed in all respects. 1 concur. The student advisory vote was: Aye, Miss Kooper, Mr. Sobotka, Mr. Watson; no, none. On motion of Mr. Velasquez, this recommendation was approved by the following vote: Aye, Dr. Donoghue, Mr. Forsyth, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Howard, Mr. Lenz, Mr. Neal, Mrs. Shepherd, Mr. Stone, Mr. Velasquez; no, none; absent, Governor Thompson. litigation Initiated by Marge M. Peirce (38) A complaint has been filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County (Case No. 78 L 23408) by Marge M. Peirce based on surgical procedures performed at the Medical Center campus in May of 1977. The named defendants are Dr. Jeffeq Meilam and Dr. Howard Robinson who were or are on the staff of the University at the Medical Center campus. In September of 1978 the plaintiff served on the attorney general a Notice of Claim for persona1 injuries as contemplated by the Court of Claims Act. The complaint alleges that the defendants performed several surgical pro- cedures on the plaintiff in a careless and unskillful manner causing her serious and permanent injuries. The complaint seeks damages in the amount of $250.000 against each of the defendants, As employees of the University the named defen- dants are entitled to protection under the University’s Risk Management and Self- Insurance Program, if they were engaged in the performance of University duties. Pursuant to previous delegations by the Board of Trustees, the university counsel has been given interim authorization to take such steps as are necessary or appropriate, including the employment of special counsel, to protect the interests of the University in this matter and to provide representation for Drs. Meilman and Robinson, all in accordance with the University’s Risk Management and Self- Insurance Program. The university counsel has recommended that such authoriza- tion be ratified, approved, and confirmed in all respects. I concur. The student advisory vote was: Aye, Miss Kooper, Mr. Sobotka, Mr. Watson; no, none. On motion of Mr. Lenz, this recommendation was approved by the following vote : Aye, Dr. Donoghue, Mr. Forsyth, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Howard, Mr. Lenz, Mr. Neal, Mrs. Shepherd, Mr. Stone, Mr. Velasquez; no, none; absent, Governor Thompson. litigation Initiated by Janet 1. Woodworth (39) A complaint for administrative review has been filed in the Circuit Court of Champaign County (Case No. 78-L-1429) by Janet L. Woodworth seeking to reverse the findings of the Civil Service Merit Board discharging the plaintiff from
200 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 2 1 University employment and also requesting reinstatement. The defendants are the Baard af Trustees of the University of Illinois and the ‘Wniversity of Illinois Civil Service Merit Board.” The plaintiff is a former University employee who was discharged pursuant to the decision and order of the University Civil Sewice Merit Board as of Nwem- ber 8, 1978, for failure to return to work after expiration of a leave of absence on May 31, 1977. The complaint alleges that in the Merit Board proceedings the plaintif€ was prevented from presenting a complete and accurate defense because her attorney’s request for a continuance was denied, that the decision was based on improper evidence, that the Merit Board committed an arbitrary and capricious abuse of discretion, that the Merit Board’s decision was unsupported by substantial evidence, and that the plaintiffs constitutional guarantee of due process was infringed. Pursuant to previous delegations by the Board of Trustees, the university counsel has been given interim authorization to take such steps as are necessary or appropriate, including the employment of special counsel, to protect the interests of the University in this matter and to defend the action. The university counsel has recommended that such authorization be ratified, approved, and confirmed in all respects. I concur. The student advisoly vote was: Aye, Miss Kooper, Mr. Sobotka, Mr. Watson; no, none. On motion of Mr. Neal, this recommendation was approved by the following vote: Aye, Dr. Donoghue, Mr. Forsyth, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Howard, Mr. Lenz, Mr. Neal, Mrs. Shepherd, Mr. Stone, Mr. Velasquez; no, none; absent, Governor Thompson. Litigation Initiated by Allen Ellis (40) A complaint has been filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County,(Case No. 79L 534) by Allen Ellis, a minor, by his mother and next friend in which the “Uni- versity of Illinois Hospital, a not-for-profit corporation” is named as the defendant. The cornplaint seeks damages in the amount of $100,000 for injuries to the plain- tiffs leg which are alleged to have been incurred in December of 1976 or January of 1977 when the plaintiff was an incubator baby at the University of Illinois Hospital. Pursuant to previous delegations by the Board of Trustees, the university counsel has been given interim authorization to take such steps as are necessary or appropriate, including the employment of special counsel, to protect the interests of the University and defend this matter. The university counsel has recommended that such authorization be ratified, approved, and confirmed in all respects. I concur. The student advisory vote was: Aye, Miss Kooper, Mr. Sobotka, Mr. Watson; no, none. On motion of Mr. Stone, this recommendation was approved by the following vote : Aye, Dr. Donoghue, Mr. Forsyth, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Howard, Mr. Lenz, Mr. Neal, Mrs. Shepherd, Mr. Stone, Mr. Velasquez; no, none; absent, Governor Thompson. litigation Initiated by Desiree McTeer (41) A complaint has been filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County (Case No. 79L 1164) by Desiree McTeer based on alleged negligence which occurred in con- nection with a blood transfusion on or about January 25, 1977, in the emergency
- Page 159 and 160: 148 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 161 and 162: 150 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 163 and 164: 152 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 165 and 166: 154 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 167 and 168: 156 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 169 and 170: 158 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 171 and 172: ,160 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [December 13
- Page 173 and 174: 162 BOARD OF TRUSTEES national Alli
- Page 175 and 176: 164 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [February 2 1
- Page 177 and 178: 166 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 21 S
- Page 179 and 180: 168 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 2 1
- Page 181 and 182: 170 BOARDOFTRUSTEES February 2 1 Mr
- Page 183 and 184: 172 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [February 21
- Page 185 and 186: 174 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [February 2 1
- Page 187 and 188: 176 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [February 2 1
- Page 189 and 190: 178 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 21 s
- Page 191 and 192: 180 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 2 1
- Page 193 and 194: 182 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 21 t
- Page 195 and 196: 184 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 21 r
- Page 197 and 198: 186 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 2 1
- Page 199 and 200: 188 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 2 1
- Page 201 and 202: 190 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [February 21
- Page 203 and 204: 192 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [February 2 1
- Page 205 and 206: 194 BOARDOFTRUSTEES February 21 Rep
- Page 207 and 208: 196 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 2 1
- Page 209: 198 BOARD OF TRUSTEES February 21 c
- Page 213 and 214: 202 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Februaxy 21 u
- Page 215 and 216: This Page Intentionally Left Blank
- Page 217 and 218: 206 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 MIN
- Page 219 and 220: 208 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Req
- Page 221 and 222: 210 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Bud
- Page 223 and 224: 212 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Fro
- Page 225 and 226: 214 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Fig
- Page 227 and 228: 216 BOARD OF TRUSTEES March 21 KAMB
- Page 229 and 230: 2 1a BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 1.
- Page 231 and 232: 220 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 and
- Page 233 and 234: 222 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Urb
- Page 235 and 236: 224 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 The
- Page 237 and 238: 226 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Con
- Page 239 and 240: 228 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 be
- Page 241 and 242: 230 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [March 21 Wit
- Page 243 and 244: 232 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Dafs Number D
- Page 245 and 246: 234 BOARD OF TRUSTEES On motion of
- Page 247 and 248: 236 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 20 REC
- Page 249 and 250: 238 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 20 Dr.
- Page 251 and 252: 240 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 90 leg
- Page 253 and 254: 242 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 20 Cur
- Page 255 and 256: 244 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 20 Edw
- Page 257 and 258: 246 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 20 1.
- Page 259 and 260: 248 BOARD OF TRUSTEES [April 20 The
19791 UNIVERSITY OF <strong>ILLINOIS</strong> 199<br />
such third parties during the last three months before the employee’s claim would<br />
be barred (January 24, 1979) and to retain out <strong>of</strong> any amount recovered any<br />
Workmen’s Compensation benefits paid by the <strong>University</strong>, attorneys’ fees and costs<br />
and expenses.<br />
Pursuant to previous delegations by the <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trustees</strong>, the university<br />
counsel has been given interim authorization to take such steps as are necessary or<br />
appropriate, including the employment <strong>of</strong> special counsel and the initiation <strong>of</strong><br />
litigation, to defend the Workmen’s Compensation claim and to preserve the Uni-<br />
versity’s subrogation rights under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. <strong>The</strong> univer-<br />
sity counsel has recommended that such authorization be ratified, approved and<br />
confirmed in all respects.<br />
1 concur.<br />
<strong>The</strong> student advisory vote was: Aye, Miss Kooper, Mr. Sobotka, Mr.<br />
Watson; no, none.<br />
On motion <strong>of</strong> Mr. Velasquez, this recommendation was approved by<br />
the following vote: Aye, Dr. Donoghue, Mr. Forsyth, Mr. Hahn, Mr.<br />
Howard, Mr. Lenz, Mr. Neal, Mrs. Shepherd, Mr. Stone, Mr. Velasquez;<br />
no, none; absent, Governor Thompson.<br />
litigation Initiated by Marge M. Peirce<br />
(38) A complaint has been filed in the Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Cook County (Case No.<br />
78 L 23408) by Marge M. Peirce based on surgical procedures performed at the<br />
Medical Center campus in May <strong>of</strong> 1977. <strong>The</strong> named defendants are Dr. Jeffeq<br />
Meilam and Dr. Howard Robinson who were or are on the staff <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong><br />
at the Medical Center campus. In September <strong>of</strong> 1978 the plaintiff served on the<br />
attorney general a Notice <strong>of</strong> Claim for persona1 injuries as contemplated by the<br />
Court <strong>of</strong> Claims Act.<br />
<strong>The</strong> complaint alleges that the defendants performed several surgical pro-<br />
cedures on the plaintiff in a careless and unskillful manner causing her serious and<br />
permanent injuries. <strong>The</strong> complaint seeks damages in the amount <strong>of</strong> $250.000<br />
against each <strong>of</strong> the defendants, As employees <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> the named defen-<br />
dants are entitled to protection under the <strong>University</strong>’s Risk Management and Self-<br />
Insurance Program, if they were engaged in the performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>University</strong> duties.<br />
Pursuant to previous delegations by the <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trustees</strong>, the university<br />
counsel has been given interim authorization to take such steps as are necessary or<br />
appropriate, including the employment <strong>of</strong> special counsel, to protect the interests<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> in this matter and to provide representation for Drs. Meilman<br />
and Robinson, all in accordance with the <strong>University</strong>’s Risk Management and Self-<br />
Insurance Program. <strong>The</strong> university counsel has recommended that such authoriza-<br />
tion be ratified, approved, and confirmed in all respects.<br />
I concur.<br />
<strong>The</strong> student advisory vote was: Aye, Miss Kooper, Mr. Sobotka, Mr.<br />
Watson; no, none.<br />
On motion <strong>of</strong> Mr. Lenz, this recommendation was approved by the<br />
following vote : Aye, Dr. Donoghue, Mr. Forsyth, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Howard,<br />
Mr. Lenz, Mr. Neal, Mrs. Shepherd, Mr. Stone, Mr. Velasquez; no, none;<br />
absent, Governor Thompson.<br />
litigation Initiated by Janet 1. Woodworth<br />
(39) A complaint for administrative review has been filed in the Circuit Court <strong>of</strong><br />
Champaign County (Case No. 78-L-1429) by Janet L. Woodworth seeking to<br />
reverse the findings <strong>of</strong> the Civil Service Merit <strong>Board</strong> discharging the plaintiff from