08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 AT THE TURN OF THE CENTURY<br />

The proposed bill made <strong>the</strong> services <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> freely available<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Federal Government and to State and municipal governments, and,<br />

<strong>for</strong> a fee, to any scientific society, educational institution, firm, corporation,<br />

or individual within <strong>the</strong> United States engaged in manufacturng or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

pursuits requiring <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> standards or standard-measuring instruments.<br />

All <strong>Bureau</strong> personnel, scientific, technical, clerical, and custodial,<br />

were to be under Civil Service appointment, and to insure that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

served <strong>the</strong> best interests <strong>of</strong> science and commerce, a visiting committee <strong>of</strong><br />

five members appointed by <strong>the</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury from among <strong>the</strong><br />

leading scientists and industrialists in <strong>the</strong> Nation was to visit <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> at<br />

least once a year and report to <strong>the</strong> Secretary upon <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> its work<br />

and <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> its facilities and equipment.<br />

The staff <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new agency recommended in Gage's proposed bill<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a director at $6,000 per year, a physicist at $3,500, a chemist<br />

at $3,500, two assistant physicists or chemists at $2,200 each, two laboratory<br />

assistants at $1,400 each, two o<strong>the</strong>rs at $1,200, a secretary at $2,000, two<br />

clerks at $1,200 and $1,000 respectively, a messenger at $720, an engineer<br />

at $1,500, a fireman at $720, three mechanicians at $1,400, $1,000, and<br />

$840 respectively, a watchman at $720, and two laborers at $600 each,<br />

making a total <strong>of</strong> 21.<br />

The bill asked <strong>for</strong> appropriations <strong>of</strong> $34,900 <strong>for</strong> staff salaries,<br />

$10,000 <strong>for</strong> general expenses, $25,000 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> a laboratory<br />

site, $250,000 <strong>for</strong> a suitable laboratory, and $25,000 to equip <strong>the</strong> laboratory.<br />

These sums, Gage pointed out, were in no way excessive by comparison with<br />

those allowed <strong>the</strong> national laboratories abroad. The Normal Eichungskom-<br />

mission, established in 1868 in Berlin to regulate and inspect weights and<br />

measures, had been granted an appropriation equivalent to $250,000 in 1899<br />

<strong>for</strong> new buildings and equipment, and, its annual appropriation was $36,000.<br />

The Reichsanstalt at Charlottenburg had cost $1 million and had an annual<br />

appropriation <strong>of</strong> $80,000. Toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> German bureaus were spending<br />

$116,000 a year.<br />

In England <strong>the</strong> testing bureau at <strong>the</strong> Kew Observatory (1871), <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Standards</strong> Department (1879), <strong>the</strong> Electrical Standardizing Laboratory<br />

(1890), and <strong>the</strong> new <strong>National</strong> Physical Laboratory (1899) had total appro-<br />

priations equivalent to $62,100. Austria's Normal Eichungskommission,<br />

established in 1871 in Vienna, currently spent $46,000 a year, and <strong>the</strong><br />

Russian Central Chamber <strong>of</strong> Weights and <strong>Measures</strong>, established in 1878<br />

at St. Petersburg, with laboratories costing $175,000 and added structures<br />

built in 1895, spent $17,500 annually. By contrast, <strong>the</strong> appropriation <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. Office <strong>of</strong> Weights and <strong>Measures</strong> <strong>for</strong> 1897—98 'had been $10,000.69<br />

Ibid., pp. 9—11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!