08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

532 APPENDIX B<br />

The preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> standards, <strong>the</strong> tracing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> defining lines, and com-<br />

parison with <strong>the</strong> standards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Archives were carried out by <strong>the</strong> French section <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> International <strong>Bureau</strong>. In 1889, at <strong>the</strong> First General Conference <strong>of</strong> Weights and<br />

<strong>Measures</strong>, <strong>the</strong> prototype units were selected and deposited in a multiple-locked sub-<br />

terranean vault located between <strong>the</strong> pavilion and observatory <strong>of</strong> Sèvres. Distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining identical meters and kilograms began, <strong>the</strong> national copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

meter said to agree with <strong>the</strong> international unit within one-hundredth <strong>of</strong> a millimeter<br />

and with a probable error not exceeding two ten-thousandths <strong>of</strong> a millimeter. The<br />

copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kilogram agreed within 1 milligram, with a probable error not exceeding<br />

five-thousandths <strong>of</strong> a milligram. Two <strong>the</strong>rmometers reading to one-hundredth <strong>of</strong> a<br />

degree Centegrade accompanied each pair <strong>of</strong> national standards.<br />

The initial copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> international prototype meter and kilogram allotted<br />

to <strong>the</strong> United States, meter No. 27 and kilogram No. 20, arrived in Washington in<br />

January 1890 and with appropriate ceremonies were deposited in a firepro<strong>of</strong> room at<br />

<strong>the</strong> Office <strong>of</strong> Weights and <strong>Measures</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Coast Survey building. The following<br />

July, meter No. 2 and kilogram No. 4 were received and deposited with those accepted<br />

as <strong>the</strong> national standards.<br />

The new U.S. standards, meter No. 27 and kilogram No. 20, were <strong>for</strong>mally<br />

recognized by an order <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury on April 5, 1893, as <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

<strong>for</strong> deriving <strong>the</strong> customary units, <strong>the</strong> yard and pound, and <strong>for</strong> constructing and<br />

standardizing secondary metric standards. Over <strong>the</strong> next decade, ef<strong>for</strong>ts to legislate<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> metric weights and measures as <strong>the</strong> universal standards in this country came<br />

closer to realization than at any time in <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation. Such legislation,<br />

seeking uni<strong>for</strong>mity in weights, measures, and coinage, had been under consideration<br />

since <strong>the</strong> Colonies joined in <strong>the</strong> Articles <strong>of</strong> Confederation.<br />

THE AMERICAN ATTITUDE TOWARD THE METRIC SYSTEM<br />

The Colonies were in <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir war <strong>for</strong> independence when <strong>the</strong> question<br />

<strong>of</strong> uni<strong>for</strong>m coinage was raised by Thomas Jefferson. The decimal system he urged<br />

was finally adopted by Congress on July 6, 1785, and a law <strong>of</strong> 1828 established a brass<br />

weight obtained by <strong>the</strong> Minister <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States at London as <strong>the</strong> standard troy<br />

pound <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Mint <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> control and stabilization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> currency.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> first, President after President and <strong>the</strong> successive Secretaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Treasury appealed to Congress <strong>for</strong> uni<strong>for</strong>mity in <strong>the</strong> weights and measures, as well<br />

as <strong>the</strong> currency, "a subject <strong>of</strong> great importance," as Washington declared in 1789, "and<br />

will, I am persuaded, be duly attended to."<br />

Shortly after adoption <strong>of</strong> decimal coinage, Jefferson, disapproving <strong>of</strong> a unit<br />

derived from an arc <strong>of</strong> meridian determined on European soil, proposed instead decimal<br />

weights and measures based on a foot derived by taking one-fifth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> a<br />

rod <strong>for</strong>ming <strong>the</strong> seconds pendulum.12 A Senate committee in 1792 reported favorably<br />

on its adoption but Congress took no legislative action. Nor was Congress moved by<br />

<strong>the</strong> President's report in 1795 announcing adoption in France <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metric system<br />

and urging its adoption also in America.<br />

The Coast Survey was <strong>the</strong> first Federal agency to require a definite length<br />

standard. Its Superintendent, chose <strong>the</strong> iron-bar standard copied by Lenoir<br />

<strong>of</strong> Paris in 1799 from <strong>the</strong> Meter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Archives (<strong>the</strong> U.S. Committee Meter), given<br />

Hallock and Wade, p. 112.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!