08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY 489<br />

more up to date language what <strong>the</strong> exact functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Standards</strong><br />

are." 168<br />

The re<strong>for</strong>mulation <strong>of</strong> functions that <strong>the</strong> Science Advisory Board re-<br />

commended in 1934, to cut <strong>the</strong> depression suit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> to its cloth,<br />

had been filed at <strong>the</strong> time and all but <strong>for</strong>gotten.169 The burst <strong>of</strong> scientific ac-<br />

complishment in World War II had since changed <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> re-<br />

search. Its orientation was to science ra<strong>the</strong>r than, as in <strong>the</strong> original act and in<br />

1934, to industry.<br />

The new statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> functions, as an amendment to <strong>the</strong><br />

organic act, became <strong>of</strong>ficial with <strong>the</strong> enactment <strong>of</strong> Public Law 619 in 1950.<br />

The restatement included a significant change in direction. In <strong>the</strong> original<br />

act, <strong>the</strong> basic authority <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> resided in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

itself. Relieving it <strong>of</strong> this sometimes onerous responsibility, <strong>the</strong> amendment<br />

transferred <strong>the</strong> authority to <strong>the</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> The amendment<br />

consolidated <strong>the</strong> broad range <strong>of</strong> special <strong>Bureau</strong> activities that had been<br />

granted piecemeal in appropriation legislation through <strong>the</strong> years. Finally,<br />

it made specific in <strong>the</strong> scientific research and testing activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

its responsibilities in <strong>the</strong> new fields <strong>of</strong> science opened in <strong>the</strong> past decade.<br />

As in <strong>the</strong> organic act, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> still had six basic functions, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>y included nothing quite like Dr. Stratton's wonderful catchall, "<strong>the</strong><br />

solution <strong>of</strong> problems which arise in connection with standards." 171 It was<br />

<strong>the</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>, that was responsible <strong>for</strong>:<br />

The custody, maintenance, and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national stand-<br />

ards <strong>of</strong> measurement, and <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> means and methods <strong>for</strong><br />

making measurements consistent with those standards, including<br />

<strong>the</strong> comparison <strong>of</strong> standards used in scientific investigations, engi-<br />

neering, manufacturing, commerce, and educational institutions<br />

with <strong>the</strong> standards adopted or recognized by <strong>the</strong> Government.<br />

168<br />

Hearings * * * 1948 (Mar. 12, 1947), p. 352; Hearings * * * 1951 (Feb. 23,<br />

1950), p.2179.<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce Wallace recommended amendment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organic act to Congress<br />

in 1945, in order to incorporate authority <strong>for</strong> such <strong>Bureau</strong> activities as were<br />

covered only by supplemental legislation, Executive orders, and customary procedures.<br />

The drafting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amendment was almost entirely <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Dr. Crittenden. See<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Visiting Committee, Oct. 31, 1945, and attached correspondence ("General<br />

Correspondence Files <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Director, 1945—1955," Box 6); interview with Dr. Condon,<br />

Oct. 28, 1963.<br />

See ch. VI, p. 323n.<br />

170 For <strong>the</strong> general reorganization <strong>of</strong> executive departments, in line with <strong>the</strong> recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hoover Commission, that was <strong>the</strong> immediate occasion <strong>for</strong> enactment<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> amendment, see "New York Times," Mar. 14, 1950, p. 1, and May 24, 1950,<br />

p. 1.<br />

" See ch. I, p. 43.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!