08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

440 THE NEW WORLD OF SCIENCE (1946-51)<br />

Dr. Condon was not to project a fa<strong>the</strong>r image as had Stratton, s<strong>of</strong>ten.<br />

ing <strong>the</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> his strictures. He was not to capture cooperation by his<br />

appeal <strong>for</strong> help, as had Burgess, or to inspire devotion by his presence, as had<br />

Briggs. Genial, gracious, and <strong>the</strong> world's best company away from his desk,<br />

Dr. Condon brought to an organization largely staffed with experimental<br />

physicists <strong>the</strong> new-broom outlook <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical physicist. Perhaps more<br />

than most at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>, he was aware that <strong>the</strong> war years had revolutionized<br />

science and scientific thought and, always a prolific writer, he had <strong>for</strong> some<br />

Appropriations Committee?" Dr. Condon could only deny it had been exciting; it had<br />

been ra<strong>the</strong>r depressing (p. 2237).<br />

Prior to that questioning, Dr. Condon had talked steadily <strong>for</strong> over 2 hours (pp. 2158—2181)<br />

on <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>, in answer to <strong>the</strong> repeated queries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sub.<br />

committee: "What does a '<strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Standards</strong>' mean?" "Does <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>'s work<br />

embrace all <strong>of</strong> science and technology?"<br />

At <strong>the</strong> next year's hearing, in March 1947, Congressman Karl Stefan <strong>of</strong> Nebraska<br />

replaced Rabaut as chairman. Stefan requested that Dr. Condon use layman's language<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> committee, and raised again <strong>the</strong> joke about <strong>the</strong> scientist and <strong>the</strong> plumber,<br />

alleging that in reply to a New York plumber who had asked <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> about <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> hydrochloric acid <strong>for</strong> clearing drainage stoppages, a <strong>Bureau</strong> physicist had an-<br />

swered: "The efficacy <strong>of</strong> hydrochloric acid is indisputable, but <strong>the</strong> corrosive residue<br />

is incompatible with metallic permanence." Assuming that meant it was all right,<br />

<strong>the</strong> plumber wrote thanking <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>. The <strong>Bureau</strong> supposedly replied "We can-<br />

not assume responsibility <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> toxic and noxious residue with hydro-<br />

chloric acid and suggest you use an alternative procedure." The plumber wrote that<br />

he agreed with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>: hydrochloric acid worked fine. Frightened at what might<br />

happen to <strong>the</strong> drainage <strong>of</strong> New York skycrapers, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> was alleged to have<br />

resorted finally to simple speech: "Don't use hydrochloric acid. It eats hell out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pipes." (Hearings * * * 1948, p. 289). The joke was brought to Dr. Condon's atten-<br />

tion in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 2 (Hearings * * * 1949, p. 538; Hearings * * * 1950,<br />

p.493).<br />

Representative Walt Horan <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Washington quizzed Dr. Condon about <strong>the</strong><br />

purpOse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>: "The title '<strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Standards</strong>' should have some meaning.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rwise we are going to get lost in a maelstrom <strong>of</strong> scientific research. What does<br />

'<strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Standards</strong>' mean?" Continuing <strong>the</strong> questioning at <strong>the</strong> next hearing, Congress-<br />

man Stefan advised Dr. Condon: "Give it to us as Dr. Briggs used to do * * * so we<br />

can understand." At that and subsequent hearings, Dr. Condon was told, "Remember,<br />

we are laymen" (Hearings * * * 1948, p. 299; Hearings * * 1949, p. 526; Hear-<br />

ings * * * 1950, p. 485).<br />

Few men have written more clearly and simply about <strong>the</strong> complexities <strong>of</strong> modern physics<br />

or are more lucid in general exposition on any subject than Dr. Condon. His sole public<br />

rejoinder to his "problem <strong>of</strong> relations with Congress" occurred in a speech on Sept. 25,<br />

1951, wherein he urged at some length <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a committee <strong>of</strong> Congress<br />

concerned exclusively with science and scientific research in <strong>the</strong> Government (Physics<br />

Today, 5, 6, 1952).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!