08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BUREAU AND THE ATOMIC BOMB 383<br />

By January 1944, to extract <strong>the</strong> first element 94 from uranium.<br />

By January 1945, to have a bomb.57<br />

Speed became essential. To hasten decisions, <strong>the</strong> S—i Section, grown<br />

too large <strong>for</strong> action, was reorganized in June 1942 as <strong>the</strong> S—i Executive<br />

Committee under James B. Conant <strong>of</strong> NDRC, with Briggs, Compton, Law-<br />

rence, Urey, and Eger V. Murphree (<strong>of</strong> Standard Oil Development Co.) as<br />

members. By <strong>the</strong>n, five possible approaches to bomb production had<br />

emerged holding high promise: separation <strong>of</strong> U235 by centrifuge, diffusion,<br />

or electromagnetic methods, and production <strong>of</strong> plutonium in a uranium-<br />

graphite or uranium-heavy water pile.58 All were scheduled to be explored<br />

through <strong>the</strong> pilot plant stage, and all depended to a large degree on what<br />

soon became <strong>the</strong> principal function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>, <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> ana-<br />

lytical procedures <strong>for</strong> controlling <strong>the</strong> purity <strong>of</strong> critical materials in <strong>the</strong> reactors<br />

and in <strong>the</strong> bomb.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se materials required as many as 20 individual chemical<br />

analyses, and spectrographic determinations <strong>of</strong> as many as 30 elements in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir raw state, be<strong>for</strong>e methods <strong>for</strong> refinement could established.59 By<br />

<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1945 nearly 9,000 samples <strong>of</strong> materials were to come into <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

laboratories and almost 30,000 separate analyses completed. Equally ex-<br />

tensive investigations in <strong>the</strong> metallurgy and metallography <strong>of</strong> uranium were<br />

necessary, to determine, <strong>for</strong> example, <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> crucible materials in which<br />

uranium could be melted without contamination. Much work was also done<br />

at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> toward establishing radioactivity measurements and safety pro-<br />

cedures in handling <strong>the</strong> bomb materials.60<br />

The analytical work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> was accelerated in June 1942 with<br />

<strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> funds <strong>for</strong> three pilot plants <strong>for</strong> U235 production and one <strong>for</strong><br />

plutonium. The <strong>the</strong>oretical design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plants had been accomplished and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir construction assigned to <strong>the</strong> Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers under <strong>the</strong> dis-<br />

guise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "DMS (Development <strong>of</strong> Substitute Materials) project." In<br />

August 1942 <strong>the</strong> DMS project became <strong>the</strong> Manhattan District project, its<br />

director Brig. Gen. Leslie R. Groves.<br />

Hewlett and Anderson, pp. 54—55.<br />

Hewlett and Anderson, p. 71.<br />

The analytic research <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> was reported in <strong>the</strong> classified Manhattan District<br />

Technical Series. The few papers published by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> after <strong>the</strong> war include a summary<br />

account <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U spectrum, by Kiess, Humphreys, and Laun in RP1729<br />

(1946) ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a highly sensitive method <strong>for</strong> spectrographic determina-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> 33 volatile impure elements in U-base materials, by Scribner and Mullin in<br />

RP1753 (1946); and determination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmoelectric properties <strong>of</strong> U, by Dahi and<br />

VanDusen in RP1813 (1947). For <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>'s ma<strong>the</strong>matics group on <strong>the</strong><br />

atomic bomb and o<strong>the</strong>r wartime projects, see OSRD records, NARG 227, file MTP, Gen-<br />

eral Correspondence.<br />

60 NBS War Research, pp. 9—15; interview with William F. Roeser, Dec. 3, 1963.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!