08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

382 WORLD WAR II RESEARCH (1941-45)<br />

Partly in order to accelerate <strong>the</strong> contract research on uranium proj-<br />

ects initiated by NDRC and provide better coordinated direction, OSRD<br />

was established in June 1941, with direct access to <strong>the</strong> President. Urgently<br />

required was in<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> critical mass <strong>of</strong> a bomb, design data on<br />

a gaseous diffusion plant <strong>for</strong> large-scale separation <strong>of</strong> uranium isotopes, and<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> a heavy-water pile. Apart from <strong>the</strong> NDRC assignments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Advisory Committee (now OSRD's S—i Section), at <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> OSRD<br />

<strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> large-scale uranium isotope separation was turned over to<br />

groups under Lawrence and Urey, and that <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> element 94<br />

(plutonium) to Compton's group at <strong>the</strong> new and cryptically named "Metal-<br />

lurgical Laboratory" at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Chicago.54<br />

By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1941 research groups at Columbia, Princeton, Chicago,<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia and elsewhere had achieved considerable basic knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

nuclear properties and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical constants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> materials involved.<br />

Sufficient ma<strong>the</strong>matical calculations had been made to suggest <strong>the</strong> prob-<br />

ability that <strong>the</strong> critical size <strong>of</strong> a bomb ei<strong>the</strong>r with concentrated U235 or <strong>the</strong> new<br />

element plutonium was almost certainly within practical limits.55 On <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Fermi had constructed an experimental graphite and uranium<br />

pile at Columbia but no chain reaction had been achieved principally because<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poisoning effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boron in <strong>the</strong> uranium. No appreciable amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> U235 had been separated from only traces <strong>of</strong> plutonium had been<br />

produced, and <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> large quantites <strong>of</strong> uranium metal, heavy<br />

water, and pure graphite still remained largely in <strong>the</strong> discussion stage.56<br />

One week be<strong>for</strong>e Pearl Harbor, Dr. Briggs's S—i Section made <strong>the</strong><br />

decision recommending a major all-out ef<strong>for</strong>t to construct <strong>the</strong> bomb. Eleven<br />

days after Pearl Harbor, at ano<strong>the</strong>r meeting in Dr. Briggs's <strong>of</strong>fice at <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Bureau</strong>, Arthur H. Compton, as head <strong>of</strong> a committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Academy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sciences, outlined <strong>the</strong> time schedule that <strong>the</strong> project must strive to meet:<br />

By July 1, 1942, to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r a chain reaction was<br />

possible.<br />

By January 1943, to achieve <strong>the</strong> first chain reaction.<br />

Smyth Report, p. 71; Hewlett and Anderson, p. 45.<br />

66 If plutonium was still an unknown quantity in November 1941, it was known with some<br />

certainty that a spectacularly destructive fission bomb would result from bringing quickly<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r a sufficient mass <strong>of</strong> between 2 and 100 kg. (4.4 and 220<br />

pounds) —although nothing like even 2 kg <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material was yet in sight (Hewlett and<br />

Anderson, p. 47). On this basis it was conjectured that from 1 to 10 tons <strong>of</strong> would be<br />

required to construct <strong>the</strong> bombs necessary to devastate <strong>the</strong> major military and industrial<br />

objectives in Germany. Tonnage production, ei<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong> gaseous diffusion or centrifuge<br />

method, was believed to be 3 or 4 years away (Baxter, pp. 427—428).<br />

°°Smyth Report, p. 73.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!