08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

324 THE TIME OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION. (1931-40)<br />

Nothing like <strong>for</strong>mal approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new functions was considered,<br />

although <strong>the</strong> Board later reported that <strong>the</strong> restatement was "to a large<br />

degree * * * <strong>of</strong>ficially approved" by <strong>the</strong> appropriations act <strong>of</strong> 1935. That<br />

act replaced <strong>the</strong> 29 specific appropriation items in <strong>the</strong> budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

year by grouping <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> into 4 general funds: (1) <strong>for</strong><br />

operation and administration, (2) testing, inspection, and in<strong>for</strong>mation serv-<br />

ice, (3) research and development, and (4) standards <strong>for</strong> commerce, <strong>the</strong><br />

latter to provide <strong>for</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> cooperation in <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Stand-<br />

ards Association.75<br />

Turning from its extended study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r scientific<br />

agencies in <strong>the</strong> Federal establishment, <strong>the</strong> Science Advisory Board briefly<br />

interests and are not to be obtained <strong>of</strong> sufficient accuracy elsewhere" [quoted from<br />

<strong>the</strong> organic act].<br />

5. To serve, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as is practicable, as a centralized laboratory <strong>for</strong> physical, chemical<br />

and engineering investigations <strong>for</strong> governmental agencies, thus utilizing effectively<br />

<strong>the</strong> special facilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>, avoiding unnecessary duplication among Gov-<br />

ernment agencies and preventing unnecessary development <strong>of</strong> new laboratories<br />

<strong>the</strong> future.<br />

6. To conduct investigations looking to broader and more effective utilization <strong>of</strong> ma-<br />

terials and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> better processes and methods <strong>of</strong> fabrication, in<br />

cooperation and with <strong>the</strong> financial assistance <strong>of</strong> engineering societies, trade associa-<br />

tions, industrial and consumer groups, provided such investigations are <strong>of</strong> public<br />

and governmental interest.<br />

7. To cooperate with <strong>the</strong> Federal Specifications Board and national standardizing<br />

agencies in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> (a) specifications <strong>for</strong> equipment and supplies, and<br />

(b) safety and engineering codes; and to conduct research when necessary to pro.<br />

vide a satisfactory technical basis <strong>for</strong> such specifications and codes.<br />

8. To serve as a testing agency <strong>for</strong> governmental purchases to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

purchases <strong>of</strong> equipment, materials, and supplies meet <strong>the</strong> purchase specifications.<br />

9. In connection with national standardizing organizations to develop simplified prac-<br />

tice recommendations and commercial standards in cooperation with manufacturers,<br />

distributors, and consumers, provided such activities are <strong>of</strong> public and governmental<br />

interest; and to encourage <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> nationally recognized specifications by pur-<br />

chasing agencies expending funds derived from taxes.<br />

10. To serve Federal, State and municipal agencies in an advisory capacity on technical<br />

matters in <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> physics, chemistry, and engineering; and to indicate to<br />

citizens <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, upon request, available technical in<strong>for</strong>mation relating<br />

to <strong>the</strong>se subjects.<br />

Science Advisory Board, Report, 1934—35 (Washington, D.C., 1935), pp. 52—53; letter,<br />

LJB to Secretary, SAB, Aug. 6, 1935 (NBS Box 383, IDS—SAB).<br />

The House Appropriations Committee had suggested consolidation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> funds to<br />

Dr. Stratton in 1922. But special appropriations had served him well and he hesitated.<br />

"On <strong>the</strong> whole," he had replied, "it is not a bad plan. * * The best thing from many<br />

points <strong>of</strong> view is to have a lump sum <strong>for</strong> all purposes to carry on * * * research work,<br />

but on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand it is good business to have a specific appropriation <strong>for</strong> a specific<br />

thing" (Hearings * * * 1924, Nov. 16, 1922, p. 207). In his annual reports <strong>of</strong> 1927 and<br />

1928, Dr. Burgess strongly recommended to Commerce consolidation <strong>of</strong> funds into three<br />

or four classes, to simplify <strong>of</strong>fice procedure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!