08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

320 THE TIME OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION (1931-40)<br />

out <strong>the</strong> period <strong>the</strong> recurring tremors had <strong>the</strong>ir effect in <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Director out on Connecticut Avenue.<br />

TOWARD A REDEFINITION OF BUREAU FUNCTIONS<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> welter <strong>of</strong> emergency measures, experiments, and planned<br />

programs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new administration, three impinged importantly on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Bureau</strong>: <strong>the</strong> initial drive <strong>for</strong> economy in Federal spending, <strong>the</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t to<br />

define <strong>the</strong> relations between Government and non-Government research, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> exertions on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> common man in his role as ultimate consumer.<br />

Campaigning on a plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> Federal frugality, Roosevelt on taking<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice ordered a slash <strong>of</strong> 25 percent in <strong>the</strong> funds <strong>of</strong> every Government depart-<br />

ment and agency, making it retroactive by impounding current as well as<br />

projected appropriations. The 10-percent cut in Government salaries voted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> previous administration in <strong>the</strong> Economy Act <strong>of</strong> June 30, 1932, had<br />

necessitated an 8-day furlough without pay <strong>for</strong> all at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> but had not<br />

cut <strong>the</strong> staff.6' As a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new 25-percent slash, almost one-third <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce was dismissed, and to stretch remaining funds, a second<br />

payless 8-day furlough was decreed <strong>for</strong> those not separated.62<br />

In mobilizing <strong>the</strong> resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nation <strong>for</strong> recovery, Roosevelt ex-<br />

ercised his penchant <strong>for</strong> creating new agencies, particularly in order to bypass<br />

such <strong>of</strong> his executive departments as seemed to him ingrown and incapable<br />

<strong>of</strong> adapting to <strong>the</strong> New Deal emergency.63 His precedents were <strong>the</strong> all-<br />

powerful agencies <strong>of</strong> World War I, his guide Bernard Baruch's report on <strong>the</strong><br />

War Industries Board <strong>of</strong> 1918, which Baruch in 1931 had supplemented with<br />

a detailed program <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> a central agency to control industrial<br />

61 Letter, Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce Chapin to Visiting Committee, Nov. 10, 1932 (NARG<br />

40, file 67009/5).<br />

Schlesinger, The Age <strong>of</strong> Roosevelt: Crisis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Order, p. 256; NBS Annual<br />

Report 1933, p. 45; Annual Report 1934, Pp. 51, 75. Hearings * * * 1935 (Jan. 4,<br />

1934), p. 131.<br />

A startling economy proposed by Roosevelt in late 1932 involved transfer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong><br />

Advisory Committee on Aeronautics to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Standards</strong>. NACA's Langley<br />

Field Laboratory was to be maintained as an independent agency, but considerable<br />

savings in <strong>the</strong> NACA budget <strong>of</strong> $900,000 were anticipated in consolidating its Wash-<br />

ington staff with that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>. Questioned at a House committee hearing about<br />

<strong>the</strong> transfer, Dr. Briggs admitted he had not been consulted, but he "liked" it, and<br />

pointed out that in Britain, aeronautical research had always been under <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong><br />

Physical Laboratory (Hearings * * * 1934, Dec. 12, 1932, pp. 175—77). NACA, now<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which had strong roots<br />

in <strong>Bureau</strong> aeronautics research, was not <strong>of</strong> course turned over to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>.<br />

Schlesinger, The Age <strong>of</strong> Roosevelt: The Coming <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Deal, 1933—1934 (Boston:<br />

Houghton Muffin, 1958), pp. 534—535.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!