08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 THE TIME OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION (1931-40)<br />

Navy Department factories and foundries, Government Printing Office supply<br />

plants, Army and Navy clothing and lea<strong>the</strong>r factories, <strong>the</strong> Post Exchange<br />

organization, a wide range <strong>of</strong> Farm Board enterprises, and many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fed-<br />

eral prison industries.<br />

Nowhere in <strong>the</strong> 253-page report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> committee was <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Standards</strong> mentioned by name, though it might have answered to <strong>the</strong> in-<br />

dictment <strong>of</strong> "overdevelopment <strong>of</strong> industrial research in Government labora-<br />

tories," buried in <strong>the</strong> last pages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report. Much <strong>of</strong> that research had<br />

been initiated by industry itself, <strong>the</strong> committee found, but had "grown be-<br />

yond <strong>the</strong> original intent or desired objective in many instances." 29 The<br />

<strong>Bureau</strong> might also have answered to <strong>the</strong> charges that technical specialists in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Government, acting as industrial consultants, <strong>the</strong>reby competed with<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional consultants, and that Government patents taken out by Federal<br />

scientists on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public "prevented exclusive development by in-<br />

dustry." Since <strong>the</strong> congressional committee felt that nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> intention<br />

nor extension <strong>of</strong> Government research <strong>for</strong> industry could be accurately de-<br />

fined, it recommended only "curtailment by limitation <strong>of</strong> funds appropriated<br />

<strong>for</strong> such investigations," as a brake on Federal competition.3°<br />

The report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> committee appeared at <strong>the</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> depression,<br />

just as <strong>the</strong> incoming administration launched its massive drive against Fed-<br />

eral expenditures. Curtailment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> funds, and <strong>the</strong> investigations <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Bureau</strong> activities that followed, were to end more <strong>of</strong> its research <strong>for</strong> industry<br />

than industry bargained <strong>for</strong>.<br />

LYMAN JAMES BRIGGS<br />

It has been said that any Republican could have been elected President<br />

in 1928. That <strong>the</strong> Republican was <strong>the</strong> incumbent Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce<br />

made Hoover <strong>the</strong> unluckiest President in American history. With <strong>the</strong> stock<br />

market crash, <strong>the</strong> national income between 1929 and 1932 fell with <strong>the</strong><br />

value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar from $87.4 billion to $41.7 billion. Unemployment, from<br />

an irreducible peacetime low <strong>of</strong> 1.8 million in 1925 (representing 4 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> civilian labor <strong>for</strong>ce), reached 4.3 million (8.7 percent) in 1930. In<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> Special Committee appointed to investigate Government competition with<br />

Private Industry (72d Cong., 2d sess., H.R. 1985), Feb. 8, 1933, p. 236 (L/C:<br />

HD3616.U45A3).<br />

Ibid., p. 237. The House questionnaire on Government competition, with <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

answers, appears in letter, LJB to Hon. Joseph B. Shannon, Aug. 24, 1932 (NBS Box 339,<br />

AG). For <strong>the</strong> Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce attack on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>'s "overdevelopment <strong>of</strong> in-<br />

dustrial research," see memo, Office <strong>of</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce <strong>for</strong> LJB, Oct. 4, 1932<br />

(ibid.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!