08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 THE TIDE OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (1920-30)<br />

rubber was concerned with <strong>the</strong>ir construction, quality, care, and use.172 In<br />

<strong>the</strong> late twenties, as British control <strong>of</strong> natural rubber resources in <strong>the</strong> Far East<br />

shot prices sky high, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> extended its product testing to more basic<br />

research, including comparative studies <strong>of</strong> natural, reclaimed, and syn<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

rubbers.<br />

Attention first turned to <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> growing natural rubber in<br />

Mexico and Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, and some progress was made at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> in pro-<br />

ducing from <strong>the</strong> guayule bush a sheet rubber that compared favorably with<br />

<strong>the</strong> latex from plantation rubber.'73 A preliminary investigation was also<br />

made in <strong>the</strong> chemistry <strong>of</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic rubber, a project abandoned in <strong>the</strong> depres-<br />

sion thirties when rubber prices fell with everything else. Work on syn<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

rubber was not resumed until <strong>the</strong> eve <strong>of</strong> World War II."<br />

All through <strong>the</strong> 1930's rubber manufacturers stoutly maintained <strong>the</strong><br />

merits <strong>of</strong> reclaimed rubber, which was being used in larger and larger pro-<br />

portions in <strong>the</strong> making <strong>of</strong> tires. <strong>Bureau</strong> tests <strong>of</strong> tires and o<strong>the</strong>r products<br />

from reworked scrap and waste rubber indicated little basis <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> manu-<br />

facturers' claims. The reduced quality and durability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tires, said <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Bureau</strong>, actually made <strong>the</strong>m more costly than tires from high-priced new<br />

rubber. Not until natural rubber became available again with victory in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Pacific did <strong>the</strong> tire industry admit that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> had been right<br />

all along.'75<br />

Investigations in 1917—18 <strong>of</strong> storage batteries used in <strong>the</strong> electric<br />

trucks and tractors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Army, in submarines, submarine mines, and air-<br />

planes resulted in numerous improvements in <strong>the</strong>ir construction, <strong>the</strong> data<br />

appearing in a circular issued shortly after <strong>the</strong> war."° Scarcely any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

improvements, however, found <strong>the</strong>ir way into <strong>the</strong> batteries <strong>of</strong>fered to <strong>the</strong> gen-<br />

eral public. As a result, few products were more deficient electrically and<br />

mechanically or stood in greater need <strong>of</strong> standardization and reduction in<br />

sizes and kinds than <strong>the</strong> storage batteries used <strong>for</strong> starting and lighting auto-<br />

mobiles.177 Working with <strong>the</strong> standards committees <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Insti-<br />

tute <strong>of</strong> Electrical Engineers and <strong>the</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> Automotive Engineers, Dr.<br />

NBS Annual Report 1926, p. 31. The tire research was reported in T283 (1925),<br />

T318 (1926), C320 (1927), C341 (1927), all by Holt and Wormeley, and J. Walter<br />

Drake, "The automobile: its province and problems," Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 116,<br />

1 (1924).<br />

T353 (Spence and Boon, 1927).<br />

lIt C427 (Wood, 1940).<br />

T294 (Holt and Wormeley, 1925). C393 (McPherson, 1931), p. 17, said that<br />

reclaimed rubber at 7 cents per pound cost <strong>the</strong> consumer more per unit <strong>of</strong> abrasion than<br />

new rubber at 20 cents or even 40 cents.<br />

C92 (Vinal and Pearson, 1920).<br />

NBS Annual Report 1920, p. 86.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!