08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE AIRPLANE IN THE LABORATORY 181<br />

The instrument panel in <strong>the</strong> De Havilland—4 <strong>of</strong> 1918. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> instruments shown<br />

were <strong>of</strong> European origin, all modified by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e adoption as U.S. Army<br />

standard <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> De Havilland.<br />

after <strong>the</strong> war in a new power plant section set up in <strong>the</strong> heat division at <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Bureau</strong>.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> altimeters, airspeed indicators, tachometers, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

aeronautical instruments that came to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>for</strong> examination and test-<br />

ing were based on European prototypes. Many were still in an elementary<br />

stage and underwent considerable modification in <strong>the</strong> laboratories prior to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir adoption as standard by our Army and Navy. Successive modifications<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inclinometer or banking indicator led to an almost wholly new instru-<br />

ment. The same was true <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate-<strong>of</strong>-climb indicator, whose inherent<br />

defects could not o<strong>the</strong>rwise be eliminated.55<br />

If instrumentation and engine problems were to a degree overcome<br />

by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war, time militated against getting <strong>the</strong> highly publicized<br />

"cloud" <strong>of</strong> American planes into <strong>the</strong> air. When in July 1917, <strong>the</strong> Signal<br />

Corps was directed by Congress to design and build a fleet <strong>of</strong> 22,000 planes,<br />

nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> military services nor American industry had developed a single<br />

modern airframe or engine. A year was simply not time enough to acquire<br />

<strong>the</strong> necessary skills or experience, and <strong>the</strong> Government's overambitious pro-<br />

gram resulted in fewer than 700 planes. These were chiefly flying boats and<br />

observation planes, <strong>the</strong> latter principally a redesigned De Havilland—4, called<br />

by <strong>the</strong> American pilots who took <strong>the</strong>m up, <strong>the</strong> Flying C<strong>of</strong>fin.56<br />

"War Work," pp. 11—16, 38—40; NBS Annual Report 1919, pp. 186—187.<br />

George C. Reinhardt and William R. Kintner, The Haphazard Years: How Aierica<br />

Has Gone to War (New York: Doubleday, 1960), p. 80.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!