08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 THE WAR YEARS (1917-19)<br />

it was called on to (1) furnish scientific and technical in<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />

recommendations, (2) undertake specific research, (3) develop and stand-<br />

ardize tests and test procedures, (4) standardize materials and equipment,<br />

and (5) make new as well as routine precision measurements.<br />

The first direct contact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> with <strong>the</strong> war in Europe occurred<br />

in <strong>the</strong> spring and summer <strong>of</strong> 1917 when members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> went<br />

abroad with a scientific mission "to obtain in<strong>for</strong>mation concerning applica.<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> science to warfare and <strong>the</strong> part to be played by scientific men in<br />

<strong>the</strong> war." 29 That same spring British and French scientific missions arrived<br />

in this country and visited <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>, bringing with <strong>the</strong>m new military<br />

equipment, products <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir laboratory research and battlefield experience.<br />

The disclosures <strong>of</strong> both missions were jolting, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>y indicated a range<br />

<strong>of</strong> research abroad <strong>of</strong> which we were entirely ignorant and a superiority in<br />

certain technologies <strong>of</strong> which we were wholly unaware. Particularly im-<br />

pressive were some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> French steels and semi-steels and <strong>the</strong> developments<br />

<strong>of</strong> French radio apparatus.'°<br />

Chemicals and steel, <strong>for</strong>ging <strong>the</strong> weapons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> battle in France, were<br />

primary concerns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> throughout <strong>the</strong> war. Germany's preeminent<br />

dye industry, on which our textile industry depended <strong>for</strong> 90 percent <strong>of</strong> its<br />

dyestuffs, also made her dominant in explosives, <strong>for</strong> out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same coal tar<br />

derivatives that built <strong>the</strong> aniline industry came <strong>the</strong> phenol <strong>for</strong> picric acid,<br />

<strong>the</strong> toluol <strong>for</strong> TNT, and <strong>the</strong> ammonia <strong>for</strong> ammonium nitrate.3' This coun-<br />

try's negligible dye industry made us almost wholly dependent on <strong>the</strong> coking<br />

industry <strong>for</strong> our supply <strong>of</strong> toluol. When war came that supply was already<br />

earmarked <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Allies and o<strong>the</strong>r sources had to be speedily developed.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> spring <strong>of</strong> 1917, at <strong>the</strong> instigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Research Council,<br />

<strong>Bureau</strong> representatives met with American Gas Institute <strong>of</strong>ficials and with<br />

Federal, State, and city authorities to study procedures <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong><br />

toluol from city gas supplies, as <strong>the</strong> British were doing, and to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

adjustments necessary in standards <strong>of</strong> gas service.32<br />

29 NBS M46, "The War Work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Standards</strong>" (1921), pp. 11, 172. Hereafter<br />

cited as "War Work."<br />

'° The steel in <strong>the</strong> French 240-mm. trench mortar, <strong>for</strong> example, was much better than<br />

that in <strong>the</strong> same mortar made in this country. The French also made a satisfactory<br />

processed cast iron (semi-steel) shell that American industry was unable to duplicate<br />

until <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> established criteria its production. See "War Work," pp. 195—196.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> radio equipment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Allies, see radio section, below. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> discounted <strong>the</strong> new stainless steel made by <strong>the</strong> English and even after<br />

<strong>the</strong> war continued to believe it had only limited usefulness. See letter, SWS to<br />

Chief <strong>of</strong> Construction, Navy Department, Dec. 21, 1921 and attached correspondence<br />

(NBS Box 12, IMH).<br />

Letter, Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce Redfield to SWS, Feb. 22, 1915 (NBS Box 3, AG).<br />

See Benedict Crowell, America's Munitions, 1917—18 (Washington, D.C., 1919), pp.<br />

107—108.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!