08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 THE WAR YEARS (1917-19)<br />

and Government, and in particular <strong>the</strong> two Government bureaus "oriented<br />

to industrial problems—<strong>Standards</strong> and Mines." 10<br />

Until 1917 <strong>the</strong> war in Europe had little impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Standards</strong>. Personnel increases remained normal, <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> Govern-<br />

ment testing rose briefly in 1916 and <strong>the</strong>n subsided, and industrial testing<br />

actually declined between 1914 and 1917. Uncertain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir requirements,<br />

<strong>the</strong> military services made few demands. In 1915 <strong>the</strong> Signal Corps requested<br />

some tests <strong>of</strong> airplane frames, wing fabrics, and engines. The NACA<br />

asked <strong>for</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> airplane propellers. In 1916<br />

<strong>the</strong> Navy Department sought tests <strong>of</strong> steels going into its new warships. That<br />

same year Army Ordnance, soon to be swamped in problems, asked only <strong>for</strong><br />

a study <strong>of</strong> several failures it had encountered in elevating gun screws.<br />

Although heavy industry began producing munitions <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Allies in<br />

1914, no call was made on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>for</strong> certification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gages used in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir manufacture." But with something like prescience, Louis A. Fischer<br />

urged Dr. Stratton to seek out a gage expert and organize a special laboratory.<br />

Harold L. Van Keuren was brought in and set to work planning <strong>the</strong> labora-<br />

tory. It was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few areas in which this country was prepared when<br />

we entered <strong>the</strong> war.12 Stratton also became concerned as German sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemical laboratory ware and high-grade optical glass were cut <strong>of</strong>f, and<br />

early in 1916 he sought funds <strong>for</strong> additional furnaces and kilns at <strong>the</strong> Pitts-<br />

burgh laboratory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> to undertake <strong>the</strong>ir experimental production.<br />

The gage laboratory and glass plant were not <strong>the</strong> first such resources<br />

acquired by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>. Well aware that in <strong>the</strong> testing <strong>of</strong> materials, analysis<br />

could not be separated from syn<strong>the</strong>sis, Stratton had acquired five <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

small-scale "factories" be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> war. Learning that <strong>the</strong> machinery firm<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pusey and Jones in Wilmington was constructing several small paper<br />

mills <strong>for</strong> paper research companies, Stratton had managed to obtain one <strong>of</strong><br />

10 Dupree, Science in <strong>the</strong> Federal Government, p. 304.<br />

Export <strong>of</strong> American explosives, principally to England, increased from $6 million in<br />

1914 to $467 million in 1916. <strong>Bureau</strong> correspondence with <strong>the</strong> Secretaries <strong>of</strong> War<br />

and Navy in 1915—16 reported that munitions drawings were going to manufacturers<br />

with rio mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> necessary gages or with insufficient gages, and warned <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

"grave danger that [<strong>the</strong>se war supplies] would not fit when delivered to <strong>the</strong> field"<br />

(NARG 40, file 67009/43). Not surprising, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shells on arrival overseas proved<br />

to be "<strong>of</strong> a low standard," and in June 1916 <strong>the</strong> British War Mission established its own<br />

gage testing laboratory in New York. It came too late. In <strong>the</strong> Battle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Somme<br />

that opened in July 1916, "<strong>the</strong> faultiness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> [American.madei ammunition in <strong>the</strong><br />

preliminary artillery barrage was particularly severe * * * [resulting in] numerous<br />

premature bursts, falling short <strong>of</strong> shells, and unexploded shells." Brian Gardner, The<br />

Big Push (London: Cassell, 1961), pp. 63, 86.<br />

"NBS Annual Report, 1917, pp. 20—21; SWS Address, 15th Annual Conference on<br />

Weights and <strong>Measures</strong>, May 23, 1922 (NBS Historical File).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!