08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TESTING GOVERNMENT MATERIALS 125<br />

Government, sharply increased <strong>Bureau</strong> testing. The transfer to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Geological Survey materials program occurred less than a month later.<br />

The two events coincided with a Government building boom just getting under<br />

way, and Dr. Stratton with his enormous interest in <strong>the</strong> artifacts <strong>of</strong> commerce<br />

saw <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> an opportunity <strong>for</strong> research in <strong>the</strong> widest sense, in <strong>the</strong><br />

instruments, materials, and products <strong>of</strong> American industry.<br />

The principal structural materials that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> began testing were<br />

cement, clays, lime, structural iron and steel, and protective coatings. Mis-<br />

cellaneous materials included Government housekeeping items ranging from<br />

rubberbands and rubber belting to paper, ink, paints, textiles, and cordage.<br />

Initially limited to <strong>the</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir physical, chemical, and me-<br />

chanical properties, <strong>the</strong> tests soon raised problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir manufacture and<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance, requiring full scale investigations. What began as simple test-<br />

ing soieiy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> Government agencies in many instances be-<br />

came programs <strong>of</strong> product research, necessitating close cooperation with <strong>the</strong><br />

industries and trade associations involved.<br />

While not entirely representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

materials investigated, a brief account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>'s work on cement is<br />

illustrative.<br />

In 1911 <strong>the</strong> cement laboratories <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> tested over 23,900<br />

samples, representing almost 2½ million barrels <strong>of</strong> cement purchased <strong>for</strong><br />

Government construction projects. The sampling required 521,000 physical<br />

tests, <strong>for</strong> fineness, specific gravity, tensile strength, and time <strong>of</strong> setting. These<br />

tests did little more than determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> samples met current Govern.<br />

ment specifications. In many instances <strong>the</strong> specifications were far from clear<br />

or consistent, and nowhere did <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> find any two Government agencies<br />

purchasing cement upon <strong>the</strong> same specifications.<br />

Early in 1912 <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> called manufacturers and Federal engi-<br />

neers to <strong>the</strong> first Portland Cement Conference, in order to consider prepara-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> a single standard specification. As a result, a Presidental Executive<br />

order was issued on April 30, 1912, declaring that all portland cement pur-<br />

chased by <strong>the</strong> Government was to con<strong>for</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> specification agreed upon.<br />

Four years passed be<strong>for</strong>e final concurrence was reached and an acceptable<br />

specification was adopted by <strong>the</strong> principals, <strong>the</strong> American Society <strong>for</strong> Test.<br />

ing Materials and <strong>the</strong> American Society <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineers.51<br />

Even <strong>the</strong> most elementary <strong>of</strong> physical and chemical tests <strong>of</strong> cement<br />

disclosed <strong>the</strong> inadequacy or imprecision <strong>of</strong> many procedures and instru-<br />

ments in common use in <strong>the</strong> industry, and <strong>the</strong> test sections and <strong>the</strong> engineer-<br />

ing group at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> set to work developing better test methods and<br />

51 NBS C33, "U.S. Government specifications <strong>for</strong> portland cement" (1912); letter,<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> Commerce to Engineer Commissioner, Washington, D.C., Dec. 26, 1916<br />

(NBS Box 15, IRC) -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!