08.06.2013 Views

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BEGINNING OF GOVERNMENT TESTING<br />

The light bulb incident occurred in 1904. By 1906, Stratton reported,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was "a wave <strong>of</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m going on all through <strong>the</strong> Government service<br />

as to proper specifications and proper tests to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r goods<br />

purchased complied with specification." 76<br />

91<br />

- And <strong>Bureau</strong> testing <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gov-<br />

ernment began to double annually as increasing varieties and quantities <strong>of</strong><br />

Government supplies and materials were sent to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e accept-<br />

ance. The <strong>Bureau</strong> was called on to test <strong>the</strong> tensile strength <strong>of</strong> a new cable<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> elevator in <strong>the</strong> Washington Monument, <strong>the</strong> cement used in <strong>the</strong> con-<br />

struction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new House Office Building, paper and inks <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Govern-<br />

ment Printing Office, paints, oils, and varnishes <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lighthouse Board,<br />

and virtually every instrument and piece <strong>of</strong> apparatus destined <strong>for</strong> a Federal<br />

laboratory.<br />

Congress, concerned over <strong>the</strong> repeated increases in personnel and<br />

funds that Dr. Stratton found it necessary to ask <strong>for</strong>, complained that it was<br />

"shocked a little bit by <strong>the</strong> way [<strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong>] is developing." In answer<br />

to <strong>the</strong> question, "Do you not think that you are broadening <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

work <strong>of</strong> your <strong>Bureau</strong>?" Stratton described <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government<br />

testing program.77 This testing had not been specified in <strong>the</strong> organic act,<br />

nor even contemplated when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> was founded. But <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

laboratories were uniquely well fitted to make such tests, and great economies<br />

accrued to <strong>the</strong> Government as a result. It was, Stratton told Congress, al-<br />

most entirely "commercial testing" and <strong>of</strong>fered little opportunity <strong>for</strong> original<br />

investigation or research; still, it necessitated hiring specialists in many<br />

fields and large numbers <strong>of</strong> aids, apprentices, and assistants.<br />

By 1908 two-thirds <strong>of</strong> all testing at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> was <strong>for</strong> Federal agen-<br />

cies alone. During that year it carried out tests <strong>for</strong> 37 bureaus and divisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government, analyzing rag and wood papers <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Post Office<br />

Department and <strong>the</strong> Government Printing Office, investigating naphthas and<br />

celluloids as cargo hazards <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Steamship Inspection Service, assisting<br />

in Pure Food and Drug Law analyses, and carrying out a long series <strong>of</strong><br />

cement and concrete examinations <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Panama Canal Commission. As<br />

an illustration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> usefulness <strong>of</strong> its tests, said Stratton, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> had<br />

recently rejected outright 4 <strong>of</strong> 6 samples <strong>of</strong> varnish and 14 <strong>of</strong> 24 samples <strong>of</strong><br />

paint submitted <strong>for</strong> analysis by <strong>the</strong> Lighthouse Board.78<br />

So extensive had this testing program become by 1909 that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong><br />

had to restrict its own research and was experiencing difficulty in handling<br />

76 Hearings * * * 1908 (Nov. 30, 1906), p. 351.<br />

Hearings * * * 1904 (Dec. 2, 1904), p. 229; Hearings * * * 1907 (Feb. 23, 1906,)<br />

p. 657.<br />

Hearings * * * 1909 (January 30, 1908), PP. 495—496; Hearings * * * 1910 (Dec. 4,<br />

1908), p. 171.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!