OFR 151.pdf - CRC LEME
OFR 151.pdf - CRC LEME
OFR 151.pdf - CRC LEME
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 6 (LATE CRETACEOUS CLIMATES)<br />
6.1 Global backdrop<br />
Equator to pole temperature gradients remained relatively low during the Cenomanian to<br />
Maastrichtian but the poleward transport of heat via warm, saline water was far from uniform.<br />
For example, differences in surface water temperature between low and high latitudes are<br />
estimated to have been about 1-4 0 C during the Coniacian-Santonian and up to 14 0 C during the<br />
Late Albian and Late Maastrichtian.<br />
Most palaeotemperature estimates are based on stable isotope (δ 18 O, δ 13 C) analyses of Albian-<br />
Maastrichtian foraminifera recovered from deep-sea drilling (DSDP/ODP) sites. An<br />
exception is Horrell (1991) who has used a combination of geological and biological evidence<br />
to reconstruct global climatic zones for the Maastrichtian. Leaf margin analysis of floras<br />
preserved near the North Pole show mean annual air temperatures of 10 ± 3 0° C during the<br />
Cenomanian (Herman and Spicer 1997) whilst temperatures during the Coniacian and<br />
Campanian-Maastrichtian were 2-3 0 C and 2-8 0 C higher, respectively (Parrish and Spicer<br />
1988). δ 18 O data from the Naturaliste Plateau (palaeolatitude 58 0 S) in the southern Indian<br />
Ocean, the Falkland Plateau (palaeolatitude 58 0 -62 0 S) in the South-west Atlantic Ocean, and<br />
Weddell Sea (palaeolatitude 65 0 S) indicate similar warming at middle to high palaeolatitudes<br />
in the Southern Hemisphere during the Cenomanian. Clarke and Jenkyns (1999) propose that<br />
global SSTs peaked sometime between the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary and the Middle<br />
Turonian, a period when global relative sea levels were higher than at any other time during<br />
the Mesozoic (Haq et al. 1987). The timing has been challenged by Kuypers et al. (1999),<br />
based on δ 13 C evidence for a large drawdown in atmospheric CO2 at the<br />
Cenomanian/Turonian boundary, which implies major climatic cooling during the Early<br />
Turonian.<br />
SSTs remained relatively warm into the early Early Campanian but began to cool during the<br />
late Early Campanian (Huber et al. 1995). This cooling, which continued throughout the<br />
Maastrichtian, has been linked to the regression of epicontinental seaways from North<br />
America, Europe, Asia, South America and Africa (Frank and Arthur 1999). The same<br />
authors propose that a major reorganisation of ocean circulation patterns occurred at the midlate<br />
Maastrichtian boundary, resulting in the development of a thermohaline circulation<br />
system similar to that of the modern oceans. Miller et al. (1999) interpret a very rapid drop of<br />
30-40 m in relative sea level, which occurred at about the same time, as evidence for the<br />
development of moderate-sized ice sheets on high latitude landmasses.<br />
Evidence is mounting that Late Cretaceous cooling was terminated by a short-lived warming<br />
event during the last 0.5 million years of Maastrichtian time although SSTs in the equatorial<br />
Pacific were only as warm (~27-29 0 C) as now (Wilson and Opdyke 1996). Conversely, Li<br />
and Keller (1998) report rapid cooling occurred within 100,000 years of the<br />
Cretaceous/Tertiary (K/T) boundary at one mid latitude site in the South Atlantic. Johnson et<br />
al. (1989) report increased megafloral turnover below the K/T boundary in North Dakota but<br />
the change is smaller than turnover at the K/T boundary. Jeffery (1997) proposes climates<br />
became increasingly seasonal and unstable over a broad latitudinal range across the K/T<br />
boundary. The hypothesis that the K/T boundary reflects the impact of a large (~10 km)<br />
bolide onto the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico is almost universally accepted (Norris et al. 1999).<br />
69