08.06.2013 Views

Supramolecular Polymerizations

Supramolecular Polymerizations

Supramolecular Polymerizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

514 A. Ciferri<br />

Figure 3. (a) Bifunctional units with binding sites along the N<br />

and S (or E and W) directions, yielding linear polymers. (b) Tetrafunctional<br />

units with two sites along N and S, and two sites<br />

along N-E and S-E (same side of the assembly), yielding linear<br />

or helical double chains. (c) Tetrafunctional units with sites at<br />

right angles within the cross-sectional or equatorial area of the<br />

unimer, yielding planar polymers. (d) Hexafunctional units with<br />

sites as in (c), and two additional sites on the flat surfaces or<br />

poles, yielding three-dimensional polymers.<br />

2. Classical supramolecular interactions (Coulombic,<br />

hydrogen and van der Waals bonds) are localized at specific<br />

sites or atoms of the unimers. These sites may be<br />

distributed at discrete locations over the surface of the<br />

unimers: the direction of interaction determines the functionality<br />

of the unimer and, in turn, the dimensionality of<br />

the assembly (cf. next section and Figure 3). These localized<br />

interactions are described by the respective set of<br />

potential functions involving combinations of point<br />

charges, dipolar interaction and separation distances. Several<br />

combinations of the above interactions may occur<br />

over the surface of the unimer, additively contributing to<br />

the overall binding free energy. [56, 72] Cooperative effects<br />

(when the formation of the first pairwise interaction<br />

increases the binding constant at successive sites along<br />

the chain) are also possible. In the case of H-bonds that –<br />

due to their strong directionality – are a primary source<br />

of stabilization of several SPs in class A, the parallel or<br />

antiparallel arrangement of multiple bonds may increase<br />

or decrease the product of the single binding constants on<br />

account of secondary electrostatic interaction.<br />

[5, 6]<br />

In addition to the above site-localized classical interactions,<br />

other stabilizing interactions play an important role<br />

in polymeric assemblies. [1] The solvophobic bond is<br />

responsible for the micellization of amphiphiles in the<br />

presence of a solvent. Even in the absence of a solvent,<br />

the incompatibility of amphiphilic components produces<br />

their ordered microsegregation. These interactions can be<br />

described by thermodynamic parameters that control<br />

micro- and macrophase separations. For instance, the<br />

Flory-Huggins thermodynamic parameter v plays a primary<br />

role in the theoretical description of microsegregation<br />

in block copolymers (cf. ref. [1, 81] and Section 4.2).<br />

The occurrence of liquid crystallinity in solutions of<br />

several polymeric assemblies is an example of hierarchical<br />

structurization (“macroscopic expression of molecular<br />

recognition” [2] ). Again, a thermodynamic effect (e.g.,<br />

volume exclusion resulting from the shape anisotropy of<br />

rigid SPs) is the primary driving force for structurization.<br />

Note that it is convenient to distinguish the role of shape<br />

in the stabilization of individual unimers (shape I effect,<br />

cf. (iii) above) from the role of shape anisotropy in the<br />

development of liquid crystallinity by rigid SPs (shape II<br />

effect, cf. ref. [1] and Section 4.1).<br />

3 Functionality of the Unimer and<br />

Dimensionality of the Assembly<br />

The assessment of unimer functionality is a primary<br />

requirement for determining the dimensionality of the<br />

assembly. Bifunctional rod-like, disk-like or spherical<br />

unimers (see scheme in Figure 3a) having binding sites<br />

pointing toward the North and South directions (or<br />

toward East and West) yield linear polymers. Note that it<br />

is the directionality of the interaction that specifies the<br />

functionality, e.g., the same functionality is assumed if<br />

four H-bonds rather than a single one point in the same<br />

direction.<br />

Increasing the functionality of the unimers produces<br />

more complex structures. The presence of two additional<br />

sites produces extended or helical double chains, [1, 7] provided<br />

the additional sites are located at the same side of<br />

the assembly (e.g., NE and SE, Figure 3b). However, planar<br />

assemblies are expected when four sites point toward<br />

perpendicular directions within a cross-section of cylindrical<br />

and disk-like unimers, or the equatorial plane of a<br />

spherical unimer (Figure 3c). The occurrence of two<br />

additional sites on the flat surfaces of cylinders and disks,<br />

or the poles of a sphere, generates a three-dimensionally<br />

ordered network (Figure 3d).<br />

The symbols +, –, 0, and 9, in Figure 3 indicate the<br />

functionality and refer to any possible localized supramolecular<br />

bond (Coulombic, hydrogen, van der Waals). In<br />

the case of non-localized effects, such as incompatibility<br />

and shape II-induced mesophases, a more uniform distribution<br />

of repulsive interaction ought to be assumed. In a<br />

few cases a polymer is undoubtedly formed, but the specification<br />

of unimer size and shape may not be straightforward.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!