Supramolecular Polymerizations
Supramolecular Polymerizations
Supramolecular Polymerizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
514 A. Ciferri<br />
Figure 3. (a) Bifunctional units with binding sites along the N<br />
and S (or E and W) directions, yielding linear polymers. (b) Tetrafunctional<br />
units with two sites along N and S, and two sites<br />
along N-E and S-E (same side of the assembly), yielding linear<br />
or helical double chains. (c) Tetrafunctional units with sites at<br />
right angles within the cross-sectional or equatorial area of the<br />
unimer, yielding planar polymers. (d) Hexafunctional units with<br />
sites as in (c), and two additional sites on the flat surfaces or<br />
poles, yielding three-dimensional polymers.<br />
2. Classical supramolecular interactions (Coulombic,<br />
hydrogen and van der Waals bonds) are localized at specific<br />
sites or atoms of the unimers. These sites may be<br />
distributed at discrete locations over the surface of the<br />
unimers: the direction of interaction determines the functionality<br />
of the unimer and, in turn, the dimensionality of<br />
the assembly (cf. next section and Figure 3). These localized<br />
interactions are described by the respective set of<br />
potential functions involving combinations of point<br />
charges, dipolar interaction and separation distances. Several<br />
combinations of the above interactions may occur<br />
over the surface of the unimer, additively contributing to<br />
the overall binding free energy. [56, 72] Cooperative effects<br />
(when the formation of the first pairwise interaction<br />
increases the binding constant at successive sites along<br />
the chain) are also possible. In the case of H-bonds that –<br />
due to their strong directionality – are a primary source<br />
of stabilization of several SPs in class A, the parallel or<br />
antiparallel arrangement of multiple bonds may increase<br />
or decrease the product of the single binding constants on<br />
account of secondary electrostatic interaction.<br />
[5, 6]<br />
In addition to the above site-localized classical interactions,<br />
other stabilizing interactions play an important role<br />
in polymeric assemblies. [1] The solvophobic bond is<br />
responsible for the micellization of amphiphiles in the<br />
presence of a solvent. Even in the absence of a solvent,<br />
the incompatibility of amphiphilic components produces<br />
their ordered microsegregation. These interactions can be<br />
described by thermodynamic parameters that control<br />
micro- and macrophase separations. For instance, the<br />
Flory-Huggins thermodynamic parameter v plays a primary<br />
role in the theoretical description of microsegregation<br />
in block copolymers (cf. ref. [1, 81] and Section 4.2).<br />
The occurrence of liquid crystallinity in solutions of<br />
several polymeric assemblies is an example of hierarchical<br />
structurization (“macroscopic expression of molecular<br />
recognition” [2] ). Again, a thermodynamic effect (e.g.,<br />
volume exclusion resulting from the shape anisotropy of<br />
rigid SPs) is the primary driving force for structurization.<br />
Note that it is convenient to distinguish the role of shape<br />
in the stabilization of individual unimers (shape I effect,<br />
cf. (iii) above) from the role of shape anisotropy in the<br />
development of liquid crystallinity by rigid SPs (shape II<br />
effect, cf. ref. [1] and Section 4.1).<br />
3 Functionality of the Unimer and<br />
Dimensionality of the Assembly<br />
The assessment of unimer functionality is a primary<br />
requirement for determining the dimensionality of the<br />
assembly. Bifunctional rod-like, disk-like or spherical<br />
unimers (see scheme in Figure 3a) having binding sites<br />
pointing toward the North and South directions (or<br />
toward East and West) yield linear polymers. Note that it<br />
is the directionality of the interaction that specifies the<br />
functionality, e.g., the same functionality is assumed if<br />
four H-bonds rather than a single one point in the same<br />
direction.<br />
Increasing the functionality of the unimers produces<br />
more complex structures. The presence of two additional<br />
sites produces extended or helical double chains, [1, 7] provided<br />
the additional sites are located at the same side of<br />
the assembly (e.g., NE and SE, Figure 3b). However, planar<br />
assemblies are expected when four sites point toward<br />
perpendicular directions within a cross-section of cylindrical<br />
and disk-like unimers, or the equatorial plane of a<br />
spherical unimer (Figure 3c). The occurrence of two<br />
additional sites on the flat surfaces of cylinders and disks,<br />
or the poles of a sphere, generates a three-dimensionally<br />
ordered network (Figure 3d).<br />
The symbols +, –, 0, and 9, in Figure 3 indicate the<br />
functionality and refer to any possible localized supramolecular<br />
bond (Coulombic, hydrogen, van der Waals). In<br />
the case of non-localized effects, such as incompatibility<br />
and shape II-induced mesophases, a more uniform distribution<br />
of repulsive interaction ought to be assumed. In a<br />
few cases a polymer is undoubtedly formed, but the specification<br />
of unimer size and shape may not be straightforward.