08.06.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, this is not what we find. Instead, <strong>the</strong> M tone skips <strong>the</strong> secondary<br />

articulation <strong>and</strong> lodges on <strong>the</strong> = instead. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> secondary articulation is<br />

transparent to <strong>the</strong> tone patterns, <strong>and</strong> so it is best to interpret it as not bearing tone.<br />

The two secondary articulations have a limited distribution in <strong>the</strong> syllable. Both<br />

are attested following <strong>the</strong> velar <strong>and</strong> glottal consonants: , C, C C, C C , <strong>and</strong> D. In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />

palatal <strong>of</strong>f-glide is attested following in two lexical items, MK= MK= MK= MK= ‘giraffe’ <strong>and</strong> C>=== C>=== C>=== C>===<br />

‘November’, <strong>and</strong> following in one lexical item, (= (= (= (= ‘to shake’. Also, <strong>the</strong> marginal<br />

phoneme could be interpreted as <strong>the</strong> sequence + , as mentioned in Section 2.1.3, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is more evidence for <strong>the</strong> phonemic status <strong>of</strong> than for or . It occurs in more<br />

lexical items, <strong>and</strong> it is found in both word-initial <strong>and</strong> word-medial position. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

its interpretation as a phoneme is tentative.<br />

Two observations concerning <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> labialization <strong>and</strong> palatalization<br />

are worth noting. First, Ladefoged & Maddieson (p. 356) note that cross-linguistically<br />

labialization most commonly co-occurs with velar obstruents. This generalization holds<br />

for Mono as well. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Ladefoged & Maddieson note that <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />

secondary articulations, it is labialization which usually co-occurs with <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> segments (p. 356). In Mono, we see that palatalization lays<br />

claim to this, since it co-occurs with l <strong>and</strong> (<strong>and</strong> depending on how is interpreted) in<br />

addition to <strong>the</strong> velar <strong>and</strong> glottal consonants.<br />

Within a morpheme, <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-glides are nearly always followed by <strong>the</strong> vowel a.<br />

The only exceptions to this are ei<strong>the</strong>r in ideophones (CAH CAH CAH CAH ‘sound <strong>of</strong> a bell’ <strong>and</strong><br />

DM DM = = = = ‘hot’) or body parts (=( =( =( =( ‘ho<strong>of</strong>’). The secondary articulations do not immediately<br />

follow labial-velar consonants, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y do not combine with each o<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

syllable. The examples in my corpus are:<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!