08.06.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in that <strong>the</strong>y most <strong>of</strong>ten come about through semantic shift. Since this process may occur<br />

repeatedly <strong>and</strong> independently, it is not fully reliable.”<br />

In addition, in this study we have seen how <strong>the</strong>re can be confusion between<br />

isoglosses <strong>and</strong> innovations. An isogloss indicates a linguistic boundary, but this may not<br />

necessarily indicate that <strong>the</strong> opposing words both represent innovations at <strong>the</strong> same<br />

genetic level.<br />

4. The comparative method. The comparative method has been traditionally<br />

considered <strong>the</strong> most accurate means by which to establish <strong>the</strong> genetic relationships<br />

between languages. The method involves comparing lexical items <strong>and</strong> grammatical forms<br />

between languages, setting up correspondences between <strong>the</strong> phonemes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n making hypo<strong>the</strong>ses about <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proto-language <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sound laws<br />

which led to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present-day languages in <strong>the</strong> family.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative method has been neglected in Niger-Congo<br />

classification. It has been used on a micro level to establish <strong>the</strong> genetic relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

certain subgroups within Niger-Congo, e.g. Bantu, but to date <strong>the</strong>re has been no<br />

concerted effort to establish a proto-system for Niger-Congo as a whole, along with <strong>the</strong><br />

sound laws which led to <strong>the</strong> modern languages in <strong>the</strong> family. Dixon (1997: 32-35) does<br />

not mince words in criticizing <strong>the</strong> Africanists for this, but to <strong>the</strong>ir credit, <strong>the</strong> Africanists<br />

have stated all along <strong>the</strong> tentative nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir conclusions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative method to verify <strong>the</strong>ir findings.<br />

Dixon (1997) points out that <strong>the</strong>re are certain problems associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

comparative method. First, it cannot be used blindly as a discovery procedure to<br />

mechanically produce a reconstruction. Dixon provides a couple <strong>of</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>tical<br />

examples to illustrate this point. Second, he quotes Bloomfield (1933), who states:<br />

The comparative method, <strong>the</strong>n—our only method for <strong>the</strong> reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />

prehistoric language—would work accurately for absolutely uniform speechcommunities<br />

<strong>and</strong> sudden, sharp cleavages. Since <strong>the</strong>se presuppositions are never<br />

271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!