08.06.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

study informing <strong>the</strong> internal classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Core languages remains to be<br />

conducted.<br />

It is also unclear whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> different subgroups within <strong>the</strong> Central Core consist<br />

<strong>of</strong> speech varieties which are indeed mutually unintelligible. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, can each<br />

node under Central Core be considered a separate language, or is it better to speak <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Central Core as being a single language with six major dialectal variants? One possible<br />

means <strong>of</strong> testing this is <strong>the</strong> Recorded Text Test (RTT, Casad 1974). In <strong>the</strong> RTT, texts are<br />

recorded in several related speech varieties. These texts are <strong>the</strong>n played for speakers <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r speech varieties <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> subjects are graded for <strong>the</strong>ir level <strong>of</strong> comprehension <strong>of</strong><br />

each text. Of course, care must be taken to insure that <strong>the</strong> test is in fact measuring<br />

inherent intelligibility <strong>and</strong> not learned intelligibility.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> mid 1990’s, researchers with <strong>SIL</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association Centrafricaine pour<br />

la Traduction de la Bible et l’Alphabetisation (ACATBA) in CAR conducted language<br />

surveys in Linda (Blühberger 1996), Yakpa (Moehama 1994), Togbo (Buchanan 1996),<br />

Yangere (Moehama 1995), <strong>and</strong> Ngbugu (Kieschke 1993). The first four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se surveys<br />

conducted a “rapid appraisal” RTT, a simplified form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test in which an evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> intelligibility is made by playing a text from a related speech variety for a group <strong>of</strong><br />

people (ra<strong>the</strong>r than for individuals) who speak a language variety. The group is <strong>the</strong>n<br />

evaluated as having one <strong>of</strong> three levels: (1) good intelligibility, (2) some intelligibility, or<br />

(3) no intelligibility. For <strong>the</strong> surveys conducted, <strong>the</strong> following scores were obtained:<br />

Table 1.2: Levels <strong>of</strong> intelligibility between B<strong>and</strong>a speech varieties<br />

Linda Mbre Ndele Mono Togbo Togbo Vara Ngbugu Mbanza Dakpa<br />

(CAR) (DRC)<br />

Linda 2(+/-) 3(+)<br />

Yakpa 1- 1(-) 3<br />

Togbo<br />

(CAR)<br />

1 2 1 1- 1 1 3 2<br />

Yangere 1 1 1- 1 1- 3 3 3<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!