08.06.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 8.27: Waveform <strong>and</strong> spectrogram <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word F F F F ‘big hoe’ (Speaker K).<br />

The average values <strong>of</strong> VOT <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations are given in Table 8.1:<br />

Table 8.1: VOT values for labial, velar, <strong>and</strong> labial-velar stops (Speaker K)<br />

Wd-initial stop VOT (ms) SD (ms)<br />

27.6 1.5<br />

F 10.2 2.6<br />

F F F F -10.0 9.5<br />

The VOT <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labial-velar stop is negative in all but one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tokens. Note that<br />

<strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labial-velar VOTs is larger than that for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r stops.<br />

Connell also noted that <strong>the</strong>re was a greater variation in VOT for labial-velar stops than<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r stops in Ibibio. 2<br />

In summary, <strong>the</strong>n, we see that labial-velar stops in Mono have <strong>the</strong> following<br />

characteristics. The primary acoustic correlate <strong>of</strong> implosive consonants is not present; <strong>the</strong><br />

2 Connell implies that a negative value <strong>of</strong> VOT for F<br />

F F F is evidence <strong>of</strong> a glottalic ingressive<br />

component to its articulation. However, pharyngeal pressure measurements would be necessary to<br />

substantiate this.<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!