08.06.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

One additional construction needs to be examined before leaving <strong>the</strong> topic <strong>of</strong><br />

noun compounding. In Mono, a <strong>the</strong>re are a large number <strong>of</strong> agentive nouns (Cloarec-<br />

Heiss, p. 134, refers to <strong>the</strong>m as noms d’agent), consisting <strong>of</strong> = = = = <br />

<br />

‘person, owner’ plus a<br />

noun or infinitive verb (14). The form = = = = <br />

<br />

is a truncation <strong>of</strong> =AC =AC =AC =AC ‘person, owner’. 4 In<br />

some cases, <strong>the</strong>re is variation between <strong>the</strong> two, e.g. = = = = =M= =M= =M= =M= ~ =AC =AC =AC =AC =M= =M= =M= =M= ‘servant,<br />

employee’.<br />

(14) Sample agentive nouns<br />

=C =C =C =C ‘inhabitant’ < = = = = <br />

<br />

‘person’ + C C C C ‘village’<br />

= = = = =C>= =C>= =C>= =C>= ~ =AC =AC =AC =AC =C>= =C>= =C>= =C>= ‘thief’<br />

= = = = =( =( =( =( ‘thumb’<br />

= = = = > > JK JK JK JK ‘deaf person’<br />

= = = = =CAA =CAA =CAA =CAA ‘host’<br />

= = = = ==5A ==5A ==5A ==5A > > 5= 5= 5= 5= ‘polygamist’<br />

= = = = K(MKI(<br />

K(MKI( K(MKI(<br />

K(MKI( ‘wise person’<br />

= = = = (@ (@ (@ (@ @ @ @ @ ‘farmer’<br />

This process is reminiscent <strong>of</strong> an agentive construction in English in which <strong>the</strong><br />

morpheme man is suffixed to a noun (e.g. milkman, postman, congressman).<br />

Agentive nouns in Mono share some properties with compounds. First, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same form as <strong>the</strong> associative noun phrase, with <strong>the</strong> head being <strong>the</strong> first element.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong>re is formal reduction, since =AC =AC =AC =AC becomes = = = = .<br />

<br />

Third, <strong>the</strong>re can be semantic<br />

restriction, e.g. = = = = =( =( =( =( ‘thumb (lit: person <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong>)’. Fourth, <strong>the</strong>re is phonological<br />

modification in that <strong>the</strong> A <strong>of</strong> =AC =AC =AC =AC becomes E in = = = = .<br />

<br />

It is not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r = = = = <br />

should be considered a separate word or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

compound has truly become fused. It is a bound morpheme which must occur with a<br />

following element, whereas =AC =AC =AC =AC is a free morpheme. However, when <strong>the</strong> following<br />

4<br />

Cloarec-Heiss (p. 135) states that in Linda <strong>the</strong> agentive form comes from <strong>the</strong> word A A A A <br />

<br />

‘mo<strong>the</strong>r’.<br />

There is indeed formal identity between <strong>the</strong> two words in Linda (<strong>and</strong> in Mono as well), but <strong>the</strong> source in<br />

Mono <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agentive form is clearly =AC =AC =AC =AC ‘person, owner’, based on examples such as = = = = =M= =M= =M= =M= ~<br />

=AC =AC =AC =AC =M= =M= =M= =M= ‘servant, employee’ where <strong>the</strong>re is variation between <strong>the</strong> two, as well as native speaker<br />

intuitions about <strong>the</strong> source.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!