Agricultural Resources Information System (AgRIS): An e ...
Agricultural Resources Information System (AgRIS): An e ... Agricultural Resources Information System (AgRIS): An e ...
P.Kumar and T.Woodhead (2002) 12 portrays that works of Nobel Laureate, Professor Amartya Sen have clearly demonstrated that during years when non-agricultural rural employment increases, rural poverty declines, and that the converse also holds. On-farm, off-farm, and on-off-farm rural employment is essential to combat rural poverty and to secure adequate livelihood within the households of smallholders and land-less agricultural labourers. Rural Non-Farm (RNF) Income is very important to food security and risk management. 1.9 Land access is highly correlated with poverty. Poverty, low agricultural productivity and natural resources degradation are severe interrelated problems in Less-Favoured Areas (LFAs) 13 . Small Farms are often more efficient producers than large farms in developing countries, and the right kinds of investments in many LFAs can yield favourable economic returns while directly benefiting the Poor (Peter Hazell and Lawrence Haddad, 2001) 14 . Many expected benefits arising from rapid agricultural growth in Favoured Areas (FAs) have been confirmed through empirical 12 R.B.Singh, P.Kumar and T.Woodhead (2002): “Smallholder Farmers in India: Food Security and Agricultural Policy”, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (Bangkok, Thailand), March 2002, RAP publication: 2002/03 13 Less-Favoured Areas (LFAs) include lands that have low agricultural potential as well as areas that may have high agricultural potential but have limited access to infrastructure and markets. 14 Peter Hazell and Lawrence Haddad (2001) : “Agricultural Research and Poverty Reduction”, 2020 Brief 70 (August 2001), International Food Policy Research Centre (IFPRI), Washington D.C 10
esearch: “trickle-down” benefits for the poor, including those residing in LFAs, and “higher social returns” for a nation than investments in LFAs. Studies also highlight that investments in FAs have faced diminishing returns and increased social and environmental problems. Anecdotal evidence suggests that investments in LFAs can yield relatively high-rates of economic return and significantly reduce poverty, given alternate uses of land and labour of people in these areas. In the first edition of his "Essay on the Principle of Population (1798)", Thomas Malthus formally framed the debate about whether food resources would be sufficient to feed an increasing world population. 1.10 Higher agricultural productivity raises the disposal incomes in the rural households and pushes up the demand support that industry so desperately needs. Non-farm activities, often with linkages to agriculture and natural resources, have important multiplier effects. The World Bank/NCAER 15 study indicates that the poor often face additional barriers, associated with low social status and low wealth. These findings resonate with observations 15 NCAER – National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi (India) 11
- Page 1 and 2: Agricultural Resources Information
- Page 3 and 4: Agricultural Resources Information
- Page 5 and 6: foreseeable future (World Bank, 200
- Page 7 and 8: play a crucial role in aggregate po
- Page 9: Eastern Region (ER) lags rest of In
- Page 13 and 14: 1.12 During the reform decade (1990
- Page 15 and 16: development cannot be achieved mere
- Page 17 and 18: • Integrating poverty reduction a
- Page 19 and 20: dependent on production and product
- Page 21 and 22: 2.6 Reaching-the-Rural-Poor makes b
- Page 23 and 24: • Providing an enabling policy an
- Page 25 and 26: - which removes virtually all barri
- Page 27 and 28: use and ways of life, to promote su
- Page 29 and 30: The Chapter 14 of Agenda 21 has bro
- Page 31 and 32: h. Farm and Non-Farm Value Addition
- Page 33 and 34: (f) Erosion data (kinds of erosion,
- Page 35 and 36: system & communication system reinf
- Page 37 and 38: SGML (Standard Generalized Markup L
- Page 39 and 40: 7.1 Based on primary experimentatio
- Page 41 and 42: • Who are our Target groups that
- Page 43 and 44: • Agriculture extensionists and l
- Page 45 and 46: culture, and to promote eradication
- Page 47 and 48: “Networking of People” and “N
- Page 49 and 50: 10.3 A decentralised agricultural p
- Page 51 and 52: • Landuse planning for cropping s
- Page 53 and 54: ♦ A decline in the non-accelerati
- Page 55 and 56: • AGRISNET - an Infrastructure ne
- Page 57 and 58: High Speed Internet Small 60-120 cm
- Page 59 and 60: the Land) have intrinsic and dynami
esearch: “trickle-down” benefits for the poor, including those<br />
residing in LFAs, and “higher social returns” for a nation than<br />
investments in LFAs. Studies also highlight that investments in<br />
FAs have faced diminishing returns and increased social and<br />
environmental problems. <strong>An</strong>ecdotal evidence suggests that<br />
investments in LFAs can yield relatively high-rates of economic<br />
return and significantly reduce poverty, given alternate uses of<br />
land and labour of people in these areas. In the first edition of<br />
his "Essay on the Principle of Population (1798)", Thomas<br />
Malthus formally framed the debate about whether food<br />
resources would be sufficient to feed an increasing world<br />
population.<br />
1.10 Higher agricultural productivity raises the disposal incomes<br />
in the rural households and pushes up the demand support that<br />
industry so desperately needs. Non-farm activities, often with<br />
linkages to agriculture and natural resources, have important<br />
multiplier effects. The World Bank/NCAER 15 study indicates that<br />
the poor often face additional barriers, associated with low social<br />
status and low wealth. These findings resonate with observations<br />
15 NCAER – National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi (India)<br />
11