06.06.2013 Views

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.34 Mr Bowcock was asked about <strong>the</strong> records <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five searches that he appeared<br />

to have conducted with Officer Plane <strong>the</strong> next day. He confirmed that <strong>the</strong> record was in<br />

his handwriting and could not remember why he had not completed <strong>the</strong> record for <strong>the</strong><br />

previous day when making <strong>the</strong>se entries.<br />

Searching a two-man cell<br />

9.35 The inquiry examined whe<strong>the</strong>r it was normal practice to search only one prisoner<br />

in a shared cell. Staff told us that ideally both prisoners should be searched but if one<br />

prisoner was not available that was not a reason to abandon a search. The inquiry<br />

understood that searches should be nei<strong>the</strong>r predictable nor avoidable, by prisoners<br />

making <strong>the</strong>mselves scarce when <strong>of</strong>ficers were ready to search.<br />

9.36 In his police statement, Mr Bowcock said that sometimes you would search only<br />

one occupant <strong>of</strong> a cell if <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r was difficult to get hold <strong>of</strong>. He could not recall why he<br />

had not written <strong>the</strong> cellmate’s name on <strong>the</strong> form. He thought it was possibly because <strong>the</strong><br />

name was not on <strong>the</strong> board in <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice or because Mr Lodge was on ‘bang-up’. He<br />

agreed it was <strong>the</strong> usual procedure to include both occupants in <strong>the</strong> search. He said it<br />

was pointless to call <strong>the</strong> cellmate to <strong>the</strong> cell since if he had contraband in his possession<br />

he could have got rid <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

9.37 Mr Downs told <strong>the</strong> inquiry <strong>the</strong>y intended to search both prisoners and called for<br />

<strong>the</strong> cellmate but it was during association and he did not answer to any calls. There was<br />

no loudspeaker system on <strong>the</strong> wing. There were many places he might be to avoid being<br />

found. It was not necessary for both prisoners to be present and at that time cells were<br />

sometimes searched without ei<strong>the</strong>r occupant being present or searched.<br />

9.38 SO Nuttall said in his statement to <strong>the</strong> inquiry that if <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r prisoner was not<br />

available at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> a proposed cell search it was not inappropriate to search only<br />

one prisoner in a shared cell.<br />

9.39 Mr Gray told <strong>the</strong> Prison Service investigators that during <strong>the</strong> search he went to<br />

his cell and <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers told him to go away. In his statement to <strong>the</strong> police, Mr Bowcock<br />

said that a prisoner came to <strong>the</strong> door and asked what <strong>the</strong>y were doing <strong>the</strong>n walked<br />

away. Mr Bowcock said he did not know Mr Gray. He said he probably would not have<br />

been aware that he was <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r occupant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cell and, in any event, by <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were well <strong>into</strong> <strong>the</strong> search.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!