Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
F2052SH: Garth 29 June to 9 July 5.5 Garth prison provided inpatient healthcare for Risley. On arrival at Garth on 29 June, Sonny was admitted to the hospital wing and a healthcare officer opened a fresh F2052SH. The reason he gave was that Sonny had been admitted from hospital following repair of self-inflicted injuries. The healthcare officer completed the nursing assessment on the form. He said that Sonny’s mood on arrival was pleasant and cooperative. He was placed in a gated cell in the prison hospital with maximum supervision and staff were to observe his physical condition in case of any complications after the surgery to his arms. 5.6 Next morning, the medical officer conducted a lengthy examination recorded in the Inmate Medical Record (IMR) and summarised in the Health Care Assessment in the F2052SH. He found Sonny emotional at present, with no evidence of mental illness and no intention of self harm on arrival at Garth. He described him as seeming a quiet, pleasant individual. He concluded that he needed counselling. 5.7 The medical officer prepared a healthcare discharge report for the F2052SH on 1 July in anticipation that Sonny would be transferred from the healthcare centre to a residential unit. He noted that he had been very settled since admission and no concerns were raised. He had long standing drug abuse problems and “recent bereavements”. The recommendation on management within the residential unit was that Sonny “needs ongoing support” and his “long-term drug abuse issues needed addressing.” In fact, Sonny Lodge was not discharged but remained in the healthcare centre throughout his time at Garth. The IMR says he was being kept at Garth because an investigation was pending at Risley. 5.8 No support plan or case reviews are recorded in the F2052SH but the Inmate Medical Record contains a nursing care plan which recorded the patient’s problems/needs, the aim of care/goal, nursing action and provision for review dates and a daily record of nursing care. Nursing care plan 5.9 The goal indicated in the plan was to relieve depression and thus possible risk of self-harm. The planned actions were: to give medication and monitor the results; 35
continued assessment and recording of speech and thought content, affect, appetite, sleep problems, objective and subjective behaviour encourage the inmate to ventilate his anxieties and concerns build a therapeutic relationship based on trust where available to participate in ward activities. 5.10 The nursing record for 29 June says that Mr Lodge’s sister was contacted and told she could visit him next day. In her statement for the inquest, Sonny’s girlfriend, Ms A, said that a nurse at Garth telephoned to ask if she could visit. The nurse arranged for Ms A to visit Sonny and one of her brothers on the same day but when she arrived she was not able to see Sonny. She did not know why but arranged another visit for 8 July. 5.11 From 1 July, Sonny Lodge was considered fit for normal location and remained in Garth hospital as a “lodger”. He was no longer considered to need nursing care and the nursing record was not maintained after that date. On 9 July, he attended an outpatient appointment at Whiston hospital and from there was transferred to HMP Manchester where the F2052SH remained open. Daily supervision and support record 5.12 During the 11 days that the F2052SH file was open at Garth there are 27 entries as follows in the daily supervision and support record. The initial observations were entered in both the nursing record and the F2052SH. I have abbreviated or clarified some entries and highlighted in bold type the 13 entries that imply conversation rather than just observation – though it is not always possible to be clear about this. 36
- Page 1 and 2: Report of the Inquiry into the circ
- Page 3 and 4: Crown Copyright 2009 The text in th
- Page 5 and 6: Reports from HM Prisons Inspectorat
- Page 7 and 8: The report makes 48 findings but on
- Page 9 and 10: CONTENTS PART ONE: WHAT LED TO THE
- Page 11 and 12: viii
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 SONNY LODGE AND AN OUTLIN
- Page 15 and 16: denied the charge. He admitted push
- Page 17 and 18: and to Sonny’s wing. A health car
- Page 19 and 20: was not aware of Sonny’s history
- Page 21 and 22: The Court said that any failure to
- Page 23 and 24: structure the inquiry’s considera
- Page 25 and 26: 2.25 At the hearings, the solicitor
- Page 27 and 28: or recognition. Their actions may b
- Page 29 and 30: 18 In inquiries of this kind it ma
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 3: RISLEY: 15 TO 26 JUNE 19
- Page 33 and 34: 0820 Appeared to be OK when unlocke
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 4: THE INCIDENT AT WHISTON
- Page 37 and 38: admitted pushing the officer and ga
- Page 39 and 40: Officer Brownley’s injury 4.20 Dr
- Page 41 and 42: was required to resume wing duties
- Page 43 and 44: would not be a problem. He said he
- Page 45: Chapter 5: 27 JUNE TO 9 JULY 1998:
- Page 49 and 50: 4 July 0630 1650 1930 5 July 0630 1
- Page 51 and 52: Table 3 40 9 July 1335 1400 1609 17
- Page 53 and 54: point on the history sheets kept on
- Page 55 and 56: working prison occupied mainly by c
- Page 57 and 58: privileges over and above the facil
- Page 59 and 60: the actual memory of many of its st
- Page 61 and 62: with officers in the kitchen for go
- Page 63 and 64: H wing: 25 July to 1 August 7.37 In
- Page 65 and 66: 7.48 On Sunday 16 August, an entry
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 8: SUNDAY 23 AUGUST TO THE
- Page 69 and 70: Wing officer 8.8 Officer Sanderson
- Page 71 and 72: chaplains to see him. Ms Lorimer to
- Page 73 and 74: Thursday morning 8.21 Captain Palme
- Page 75 and 76: 9.5 Officer Downs told the inquiry
- Page 77 and 78: visit before time and that there wa
- Page 79 and 80: ecollection of the incident and mus
- Page 81 and 82: 9.34 Mr Bowcock was asked about the
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 10: AFTER THE SEARCH: THE I
- Page 85 and 86: and now they’re doing three years
- Page 87 and 88: Mr Lodge’s account of the inciden
- Page 89 and 90: HCOs advised staff to loosen their
- Page 91 and 92: punishment for the altercation in t
- Page 93 and 94: 82 The diagnosis of dissocial pers
- Page 95 and 96: 11.6 Back in the chaplains’ offic
F2052SH: Garth 29 June to 9 July<br />
5.5 Garth prison provided inpatient healthcare for Risley. On arrival at Garth on 29<br />
June, Sonny was admitted to <strong>the</strong> hospital wing and a healthcare <strong>of</strong>ficer opened a fresh<br />
F2052SH. The reason he gave was that Sonny had been admitted from hospital<br />
following repair <strong>of</strong> self-inflicted injuries. The healthcare <strong>of</strong>ficer completed <strong>the</strong> nursing<br />
assessment on <strong>the</strong> form. He said that Sonny’s mood on arrival was pleasant and<br />
cooperative. He was placed in a gated cell in <strong>the</strong> prison hospital with maximum<br />
supervision and staff were to observe his physical condition in case <strong>of</strong> any complications<br />
after <strong>the</strong> surgery to his arms.<br />
5.6 Next morning, <strong>the</strong> medical <strong>of</strong>ficer conducted a lengthy examination recorded in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Inmate Medical Record (IMR) and summarised in <strong>the</strong> Health Care Assessment in <strong>the</strong><br />
F2052SH. He found Sonny emotional at present, with no evidence <strong>of</strong> mental illness and<br />
no intention <strong>of</strong> self harm on arrival at Garth. He described him as seeming a quiet,<br />
pleasant individual. He concluded that he needed counselling.<br />
5.7 The medical <strong>of</strong>ficer prepared a healthcare discharge report for <strong>the</strong> F2052SH on 1<br />
July in anticipation that Sonny would be transferred from <strong>the</strong> healthcare centre to a<br />
residential unit. He noted that he had been very settled since admission and no<br />
concerns were raised. He had long standing drug abuse problems and “recent<br />
bereavements”. The recommendation on management within <strong>the</strong> residential unit was<br />
that Sonny “needs ongoing support” and his “long-term drug abuse issues needed<br />
addressing.” In fact, Sonny Lodge was not discharged but remained in <strong>the</strong> healthcare<br />
centre throughout his time at Garth. The IMR says he was being kept at Garth because<br />
an investigation was pending at Risley.<br />
5.8 No support plan or case reviews are recorded in <strong>the</strong> F2052SH but <strong>the</strong> Inmate<br />
Medical Record contains a nursing care plan which recorded <strong>the</strong> patient’s<br />
problems/needs, <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> care/goal, nursing action and provision for review dates and<br />
a daily record <strong>of</strong> nursing care.<br />
Nursing care plan<br />
5.9 The goal indicated in <strong>the</strong> plan was to relieve depression and thus possible risk <strong>of</strong><br />
self-harm. The planned actions were:<br />
to give medication and monitor <strong>the</strong> results;<br />
35